102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7895579)
1. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors.
Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Nielsen ML; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 7895579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Naryshkin S; Robb JA; Cohen T; Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8639046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.
Davey DD; Woodhouse S; Styer P; Stastny J; Mody D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 10656727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Neal MH; Wilbur DC; Colgan TJ; Styer PE; Mody DR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Nov; 128(11):1224-9. PubMed ID: 15504056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ASCUS : SIL ratio and the reference laboratory pathologist.
Wachtel MS; Dahm PF
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 14510888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Papanicolaou tests diagnosed as atypical by a cytotechnologist and downgraded to benign by a pathologist: a measure of laboratory quality.
Condel JL; Mahood LK; Grzybicki DM; Sturgis CD; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 11939726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management.
Collins LC; Wang HH; Abu-Jawdeh GM
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jun; 9(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 8782207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practices of participants in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology, 2006.
Eversole GM; Moriarty AT; Schwartz MR; Clayton AC; Souers R; Fatheree LA; Chmara BA; Tench WD; Henry MR; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Mar; 134(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 20196659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Howell LP; Davis RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.
Anton RC; Ramzy I; Schwartz MR; Younes P; Chakraborty S; Mody DR
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11309773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Educational needs and causes of false diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital.
Kumar N; Sayed S; Moloo Z
Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21987946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
