These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7895736)

  • 1. Development of factor-score-based models to explain and predict maximal box-lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Deakin J; Smith T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 7895736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Smith T; Deakin J; Surgenor B
    Ergonomics; 1990 Dec; 33(12):1455-69. PubMed ID: 2286194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic analysis of isoinertial lifting technique.
    Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; French SL; Greenhorn DR; Andrew GM; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 28080938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.
    Williams AG; Wilkinson M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):638-42. PubMed ID: 17530955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIOSH equation horizontal distances associated with the Liberty Mutual (Snook) lifting table box widths.
    Potvin JR; Bent LR
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 9174416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can simple anthropometric and physical performance tests track training-induced changes in maximal box-lifting ability?
    Williams AG; Rayson MP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 16720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender differences in performance of a selection test using the incremental lifting machine.
    Stevenson JM; Greenhorn DR; Bryant JT; Deakin JM; Smith JT
    Appl Ergon; 1996 Feb; 27(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15676311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oxygen consumption prediction models for individual and combination materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG; Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1776-89. PubMed ID: 18941980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of prognostic models designed to predict wheelchair skills at discharge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
    de Groot S; Bevers GE; Dallmeijer AJ; Post MW; van Kuppevelt HJ; van der Woude LH
    Clin Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 24(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 19933243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
    Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The personal lift-assist device and lifting technique: a principal component analysis.
    Sadler EM; Graham RB; Stevenson JM
    Ergonomics; 2011 Apr; 54(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 21491281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four factor model to describe an isoinertial lift.
    Bryant JT; Stevenson JM; French SL; Greenhorn DR; M Andrew G; Deakin JM
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):173-186. PubMed ID: 28080946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regression-based developmental models exemplified for Wisconsin Card Sorting Test parameters: statistics and software for individual predictions.
    Klein C; Foerster F; Hartnegg K
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 29(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 17162719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the effect of lift characteristics on dynamic performance profiles during manual materials handling tasks.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):126-45. PubMed ID: 9973876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the optimal parameters in regression models for the prediction of chlorophyll-a: a case study of the Yeongsan Reservoir, Korea.
    Cho KH; Kang JH; Ki SJ; Park Y; Cha SM; Kim JH
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2536-45. PubMed ID: 19211132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.