These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7895740)

  • 1. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.
    Marras WS; Lavender SA; Leurgans SE; Fathallah FA; Ferguson SA; Allread WG; Rajulu SL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):377-410. PubMed ID: 7895740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury.
    Marras WS; Lavender SA; Leurgans SE; Rajulu SL; Allread WG; Fathallah FA; Ferguson SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Apr; 18(5):617-28. PubMed ID: 8484154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective validation of a low-back disorder risk model and assessment of ergonomic interventions associated with manual materials handling tasks.
    Marras WS; Allread WG; Burr DL; Fathallah FA
    Ergonomics; 2000 Nov; 43(11):1866-86. PubMed ID: 11105977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of lift frequency, lift duration and work experience on discomfort reporting.
    Parakkat J; Yang G; Chany AM; Burr D; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2007 Mar; 50(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 17536776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of nursing tasks in a hospital setting.
    Jang R; Karwowski W; Quesada PM; Rodrick D; Sherehiy B; Cronin SN; Layer JK
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1835-55. PubMed ID: 17972205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for first-ever low back pain among workers in their first employment.
    Van Nieuwenhuyse A; Fatkhutdinova L; Verbeke G; Pirenne D; Johannik K; Somville PR; Mairiaux P; Moens GF; Masschelein R
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Dec; 54(8):513-9. PubMed ID: 15385649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of drywall handling tools on the low back.
    Hess JA; Kincl LD; Davis K
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Mar; 41(2):305-12. PubMed ID: 19733834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of back motion during asymmetric lifting.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):845-59. PubMed ID: 1633792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A participatory ergonomics intervention to reduce risk factors for low-back disorders in concrete laborers.
    Hess JA; Hecker S; Weinstein M; Lunger M
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Sep; 35(5):427-41. PubMed ID: 15246881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occupational lifting tasks as a risk factor in low back pain: a case-control study in a Mexican population.
    Prado-Leon LR; Celis A; Avila-Chaurand R
    Work; 2005; 25(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 16131740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of complex, simultaneous trunk motions in the risk of occupation-related low back disorders.
    Fathallah FA; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 May; 23(9):1035-42. PubMed ID: 9589543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiology of low-back pain in industry.
    Garg A; Moore JS
    Occup Med; 1992; 7(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 1411850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of an EMG-based method for continuous estimates of low back compression during asymmetrical occupational tasks.
    Mientjes MI; Norman RW; Wells RP; McGill SM
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jun; 42(6):868-79. PubMed ID: 10340027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.