123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7896433)
1. Reproducibility of estimated cardiovascular function by transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography in healthy volunteers.
van Oppen AC; van der Tweel I; Bruinse HW
Int J Biomed Comput; 1994 Sep; 37(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 7896433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods.
Yakimets J; Jensen L
Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison and reproducibility of transthoracic bioimpedance and dual beam Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac function in healthy volunteers.
Ng HW; Walley T; Tsao Y; Breckenridge AM
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Sep; 32(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 1777364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diurnal and position-induced variability of impedance cardiography measurements in healthy subjects.
Tomsin K; Mesens T; Molenberghs G; Gyselaers W
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Mar; 31(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 21108735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics: an emphasis on bioimpedance cardiography.
Rosenberg P; Yancy CW
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2000 May; 15(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 10952420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cardiac performance: short- and medium-term variability of impedance cardiography at rest and during dynamic exercise.
Sundberg S; Akkila J
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Mar; 34(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 8705093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and precision of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance monitor in a lower body negative pressure model.
Sageman WS
Crit Care Med; 1999 Sep; 27(9):1986-90. PubMed ID: 10507629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution.
Jewkes C; Sear JW; Verhoeff F; Sanders DJ; Foëx P
Br J Anaesth; 1991 Dec; 67(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 1768552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving agreement between thoracic bioimpedance and dye dilution cardiac output estimation in children.
O'Connell AJ; Tibballs J; Coulthard M
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1991 Aug; 19(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 1767916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A
Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic effects of epinephrine in rats: evaluation by impedance cardiography.
Turkseven CH; Pekoglu E; Buyukakilli B
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2017; 118(10):613-617. PubMed ID: 29198129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stroke volume estimation in heart failure patients using bioimpedance: a realistic simulation of the forward problem.
Sokolovsky RE; Zlochiver S; Abboud S
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S139-49. PubMed ID: 18544809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of impedance cardiography in measuring central haemodynamics.
Mehlsen J; Bonde J; Stadeager C; Rehling M; Tangø M; Trap-Jensen J
Clin Physiol; 1991 Nov; 11(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 1769191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of stroke index using impedance cardiography: comparison with traditional vital signs for detection of moderate acute blood loss in healthy volunteers.
Kosowsky JM; Han JH; Collins SP; McAfee AT; Storrow AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Aug; 9(8):775-80. PubMed ID: 12153880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac function monitored by impedance cardiography during changing seatback angles and anti-G suit inflation.
Logan JS; Veghte JH; Frey MA; Robillard LM; Mann BL; Luciani RJ
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Apr; 54(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 6847570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography.
Fellahi JL; Caille V; Charron C; Deschamps-Berger PH; Vieillard-Baron A
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1553-9. PubMed ID: 19372335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Use of the method of thoracic electric bioimpedance in medical evaluation of central hemodynamics in man].
Kravtsova EL; Voronkov IuI
Aviakosm Ekolog Med; 1995; 29(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 8664863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring in pregnancy: impedance cardiography versus echocardiography.
Burlingame J; Ohana P; Aaronoff M; Seto T
J Perinatol; 2013 Sep; 33(9):675-80. PubMed ID: 23680787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of impedance cardiography in critical care medicine.
Schuster CJ; Schuster HP
Resuscitation; 1984 Mar; 11(3-4):255-74. PubMed ID: 6326226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
