198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7898185)
21. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case.
Stone R
Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Baltimore throws in the towel.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 May; 252(5007):768, 770. PubMed ID: 1851328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Imanishi-Kari case. Marathon hearing gets under way.
Mervis J
Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1561. PubMed ID: 7777851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dr Baltimore says "sorry".
Baltimore D
Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):94-5. PubMed ID: 2030740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A judgement fit for prime time.
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. NIH launches surprise Gallo investigation.
Anderson C; Concar D; Anderson A
Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6293):502. PubMed ID: 2170849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Palca J
Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
Kaiser J
Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. ORI and misconduct investigations.
Bivens LW
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
Pascal CB
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
Needleman HL
Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf.
Rennie D; Gunsalus CK
JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(7):915-7. PubMed ID: 8426452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
