These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7898834)

  • 1. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
    McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are there any relationships between umbilical artery Pulsatility Index and macrosomia in fetuses of type I diabetic mothers?
    Maruotti GM; Rizzo G; Sirico A; Sarno L; Cirigliano L; Arduini D; Martinelli P
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1776-81. PubMed ID: 24397275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
    Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
    Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating birth weight in twins. Comparison of eight sonographic models.
    Chauhan SP; Cowan BD; Brost BD; Washburne JF; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jun; 41(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 8799915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fetal weight estimation in children of diabetes mellitus mothers].
    García de Yeguez M; Castro Valderrama CR; Yegüez F; Rivas Blasco A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2007 Jan; 75(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17542262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Hod M
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 15085885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
    Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography for Estimation of Birth Weight and Neonatal Adiposity in the Setting of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia.
    Gibson KS; Stetzer B; Catalano PM; Myers SA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1123-9. PubMed ID: 27091915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasonographic prediction of birth weight in diabetic pregnancies.
    Best G; Pressman EK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 99(5 Pt 1):740-4. PubMed ID: 11978281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Siesto G; Bergamini V; Raio L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 17960667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
    Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
    Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
    Shulman Y; Shah BR; Berger H; Yoon EW; Helpaerin I; Mei-Dan E; Aviram A; Retnakaran R; Melamed N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation.
    Mongelli M; Benzie R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 16180258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.