These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 790016)

  • 1. Assessment of nasalization in the speech of deaf children.
    Stevens KN; Nickerson RS; Boothroyd A; Rollins AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Jun; 19(2):393-416. PubMed ID: 790016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between temporal aspects of oral-nasal balance and classification of velopharyngeal status in speakers with cleft palate.
    Jones DL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 10912715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An approach to evaluation of velopharyngeal adequacy for speech.
    Moller KT
    Clin Commun Disord; 1991; 1(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 1844818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow.
    Karnell MP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Mar; 32(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 7748876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of velopharyngeal competency for children with cleft palate.
    Van Demark DR
    Cleft Palate J; 1974 Jul; 11(0):310-6. PubMed ID: 4526494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
    Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between nasal/voice accelerometric values and interval estimates of hypernasality.
    Reich AR; Redenbaugh MA
    Cleft Palate J; 1985 Oct; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 3863721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomies on velopharyngeal and speech functions in cleft patients.
    Janulewicz J; Costello BJ; Buckley MJ; Ford MD; Close J; Gassner R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 62(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 15015163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Velopharyngeal assessment procedures for the Thai cleft palate population.
    Garrett JD; Deal RE; Prathanee B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):682-92. PubMed ID: 12322841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods of assessing speech in relation to velopharyngeal function.
    Van Demark D; Bzoch K; Daly D; Fletcher S; McWilliams BJ; Pannbacker M; Weinberg B
    Cleft Palate J; 1985 Oct; 22(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 3863726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observed effects of velopharyngeal orifice size on vowel identification and vowel nasality.
    Watterson T; Emanuel F
    Cleft Palate J; 1981 Oct; 18(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 6945158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between multiview videofluoroscopy and nasendoscopy of velopharyngeal movements.
    Henningsson G; Isberg A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Oct; 28(4):413-7; discussion 417-8. PubMed ID: 1742312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.
    Dalston RM; Warren DW; Dalston ET
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Apr; 28(2):184-8; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 2069975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nasality and velopharyngeal function in five hearing impaired adults.
    Lock RB; Seaver EJ
    J Commun Disord; 1984 Feb; 17(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 6715568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A telefluoroscopic study of lingual contacts made by persons with palatal defects.
    Lawrence CW; Philips BJ
    Cleft Palate J; 1975 Jan; 12(00):85-94. PubMed ID: 1053965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video Game Rehabilitation of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Case Series.
    Cler GJ; Mittelman T; Braden MN; Woodnorth GH; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6S):1800-1809. PubMed ID: 28655049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Issues involved in the evaluation of velopharyngeal closure.
    Shelton RL; Trier WC
    Cleft Palate J; 1976 Apr; 13():127-37. PubMed ID: 1062244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cineradiographic study of velopharyngeal movements for deviant versus nondeviant articulation.
    Henningsson G; Isberg A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Jan; 28(1):115-7; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 2004089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children.
    Smith CR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Dec; 18(4):795-811. PubMed ID: 1207108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech and velopharyngeal function in children with an open residual cleft in the hard palate, and the influence of temporary covering.
    Lohmander-Agerskov A; Dotevall H; Lith A; Söderpalm E
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jul; 33(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 8827390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.