147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7905106)
1. Non-renewal of life support for PVS.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1994 Jan; 343(8892):286-7. PubMed ID: 7905106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Donald McCarthy.
Harburg M
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogate decisions at risk. The Cruzan case.
Thomasma DC
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 2110204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care in the courts. Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland.
Health Care Anal; 1993 Nov; 1(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 10184149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case.
Tribe D; Korgaonkar G
Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Dec 2-1993 Jan 5; 48(11):754-6. PubMed ID: 1467821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mercy without certainty.
Puxon M
Lancet; 1992 Nov; 340(8831):1343. PubMed ID: 1360048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Saying no to life: reflections on death and justice. In re Lawrance.
Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(3):227-54. PubMed ID: 8106235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why withdrawal of life-support for PVS patients is not a family decision.
Baron CH
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):73-5. PubMed ID: 1895770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment recognized by court of law.
Levi J
Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):191-2. PubMed ID: 8377613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Position of the American Dietetic Association: legal and ethical issues in feeding permanently unconscious patients.
J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Feb; 95(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 7852693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What actually happened: an informed review of the Linares incident.
Goldman GM; Stratton KM; Brown MD
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2628644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Persistent vegetative state and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Gillon R
J Med Ethics; 1993 Jun; 19(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 8331639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Bland truth: 2.
Castledine G
Br J Nurs; 1993 Mar 10-24; 2(5):285. PubMed ID: 8485362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Conflict in the pediatric setting: clinical judgment vs. parental autonomy.
Goldworth A
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(1):36-41; discussion 41-3. PubMed ID: 7627364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re L.W.
Hanley RA; Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1993; 8(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 8463079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
Burke WJ; Pullicino P; Coverdale JF
Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391-2; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17265563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
Cochrane T; Truog RD
Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17261691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
Bernat JL; Beresford HR
Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1618-9. PubMed ID: 16769929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond Bland: a critique of the BMA guidance on withholding and withdrawing medical treatment.
Keown J
Leg Stud; 2000 Mar; 20(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 15991403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
