These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7905427)

  • 1. Mode of delivery in deep transverse arrest.
    Jain V; Guleria K; Gopalan S; Narang A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Nov; 43(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 7905427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?
    Hendler I; Kirshenbaum M; Barg M; Kees S; Mazaki-Tovi S; Moran O; Kalter A; Schiff E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1861-1864. PubMed ID: 27550831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Forceps and Vacuum Delivery at Outlet, Low, and Midpelvic Station.
    Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Mar; 41(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 30366887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
    Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL
    Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Boonrangsimant P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 3401434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
    Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.
    Towner D; Castro MA; Eby-Wilkens E; Gilbert WM
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(23):1709-14. PubMed ID: 10580069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching.
    Hinkson L; Henrich W; Tutschek B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):93.e1-93.e7. PubMed ID: 32693095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A continuing use for Kielland's forceps?
    Traub AI; Morrow RJ; Ritchie JW; Dornan KJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Sep; 91(9):894-8. PubMed ID: 6477848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rotational delivery with Kielland's forceps.
    Chow SL; Johnson CM; Anderson TD; Hughes JH
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jun; 146(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 3626909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?
    Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the use of the silastic obstetric vacuum extractor to Kielland's forceps.
    Hastie SJ; MacLean AB
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 12(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3718343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.