313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7907040)
1. Papanicolaou smear screening augmented by a magnified chemiluminescent exam.
Mann W; Lonky N; Massad S; Scotti R; Blanco J; Vasilev S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Dec; 43(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 7907040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervicography: adjunctive cervical cancer screening by primary care clinicians.
Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE; Milner FH; diPaola FM; Petry LJ
J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 8336097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evaluation of cervical cancer screening by combining speculoscopy with Papanicolaou smear examination in Taiwan.
Chang JI; Ou CH; Wu KM; Chen CC; Cheng KC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Sep; 65(9):430-4. PubMed ID: 12433029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of Pap smear sensitivity using a visual adjunctive procedure: a co-operative Italian study on speculoscopy (GISPE).
Loiudice L; Abbiati R; Boselli F; Cecchini G; Costa S; Grossi E; Piccoli R; Villani C
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 9806118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Natural history of false-negative papanicolaou smears: a prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology.
Mannino JR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1998 Oct; 98(10):542-6. PubMed ID: 9821735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopy in women with a normal Papanicolaou smear.
Peedicayil A; Regi A; Mathai M; Jasper P
Natl Med J India; 1994; 7(5):208-9. PubMed ID: 7827598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement between visual inspection with acetic acid and Papanicolaou's smear as screening methods for cervical cancer.
Naz U; Hanif S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Apr; 24(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 24709232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of the Papanicolaou smear and speculoscopy as compared with the Papanicolaou smear alone: a community-based clinical trial.
Wertlake PT; Francus K; Newkirk GR; Parham GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 90(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 9277656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.
Doh AS; Nkele NN; Achu P; Essimbi F; Essame O; Nkegoum B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15847890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the Papanicolaou smear and the cervigram: sensitivity, specificity, and cost analysis.
Tawa K; Forsythe A; Cove JK; Saltz A; Peters HW; Watring WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 71(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 3336558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the atypical Pap smear.
Jones DE; Creasman WT; Dombroski RA; Lentz SS; Waeltz JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 157(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 3631155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study.
Strander B; Andersson-Ellström A; Milsom I; Rådberg T; Ryd W
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 17724676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current concepts in obstetrics and gynecology: The patient with an abnormal Pap smear--screening techniques and management.
Richart RM
N Engl J Med; 1980 Feb; 302(6):332-4. PubMed ID: 6985710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pap smear screening in women under 30 in the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program, with a comparison of immediate biopsy vs Pap smear triage of moderate dysplasia.
Nygård JF; Nygård M; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 16780024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of cervicography in HIV-infected and uninfected adolescents.
Moscicki AB; Durako SJ; Ma Y; Darragh T; Vermund SH
J Adolesc Health; 2003 Mar; 32(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 12606114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
