These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7911554)
1. Detecting and predicting the activity of rodent carcinogens. Parry JM Mutagenesis; 1994 Jan; 9(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 7911554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the TOPKAT system for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Prival MJ Environ Mol Mutagen; 2001; 37(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 11170242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-and medium-term carcinogenicity tests: simple initiation-promotion assay systems. Tsuda H; Park CB; Moore MA IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):203-49. PubMed ID: 10353389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of the uses of rats and mice for assessing carcinogenic risk from chemicals in humans. Ward JM Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):18. PubMed ID: 20593921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Highlights of International meeting on Alternative Methods of Carcinogenicity Testing, Leesburg, VA, November 1-3, 2000, Sponsored by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. Jollow DJ J Agromedicine; 2004; 9(2):427-9. PubMed ID: 19785235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of non-mammalian species in bioassays for carcinogenicity. Bunton TE IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):151-84. PubMed ID: 10353387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The in vivo rodent test systems for assessment of carcinogenic potential. van der Laan JW; Spindler P Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 11846641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medium-term bioassays in rats for rapid detection of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Shirai T; Hirose M; Ito N IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):251-72. PubMed ID: 10353390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Thresholds in carcinogenicity in ED01 study. Rozman KK Toxicol Sci; 2003 Sep; 75(1):224-5. PubMed ID: 12923303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays: their use and interpretation. McGregor D Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():159-69. PubMed ID: 2203003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The "rodent carcinogen" dilemma: formidable challenge for the technologies of the new millennium. Johnson FM Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000; 919():288-99. PubMed ID: 11083119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transgenic assays and the identification of carcinogens. Tennant R; Haseman J; Stoll RE Environ Mol Mutagen; 2001; 37(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 11170246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Carcinogenic chemical-response "fingerprint" for male F344 rats exposed to a series of 195 chemicals: implications for predicting carcinogens with transgenic models. Johnson FM Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):234-45. PubMed ID: 10618171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Receptor-mediated non-genotoxic carcinogenesis: new models for risk assessment? Green S Hum Exp Toxicol; 1991 Nov; 10(6):390-5. PubMed ID: 1687847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toxicokinetic and mechanistic considerations in the interpretation of the rodent bioassay. MacDonald JS; Lankas GR; Morrissey RE Toxicol Pathol; 1994; 22(2):124-40. PubMed ID: 7973360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Waddell's representation of the tumor incidence data of the ED01 study is strongly misleading. Lutz WK Toxicol Sci; 2003 Sep; 75(1):223; author reply 223-4. PubMed ID: 12923302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. On interspecies correlations of carcinogenic potencies. Kodell RL; Basu AP; Gaylor DW J Toxicol Environ Health; 1996 Jun; 48(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 8656447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]