These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7911554)

  • 21. Chemically induced preneoplastic lesions in rodents as indicators of carcinogenic activity.
    Williams GM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):185-202. PubMed ID: 10353388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of transgenic animals for carcinogenicity testing: considerations and implications for risk assessment.
    Gulezian D; Jacobson-Kram D; McCullough CB; Olson H; Recio L; Robinson D; Storer R; Tennant R; Ward JM; Neumann DA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):482-99. PubMed ID: 10862569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparability of results of postnatal and long-term tests for carcinogenicity.
    Sýkora I; Vortel V
    Neoplasma; 1993; 40(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 8272162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of rodent carcinogens by an expert system.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():23-48. PubMed ID: 2203007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
    Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A perspective on current and future uses of alternative models for carcinogenicity testing.
    Goodman JI
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():173-6. PubMed ID: 11695554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neonatal mouse model: review of methods and results.
    McClain RM; Keller D; Casciano D; Fu P; MacDonald J; Popp J; Sagartz J
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():128-37. PubMed ID: 11695548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of genetically modified animals in carcinogenicity bioassays.
    Maronpot RR
    Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 10862565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of human cancer risk: challenges for alternative approaches.
    Omenn GS
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():5-12. PubMed ID: 11695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as human carcinogens.
    Huff J
    Occup Environ Med; 2010 Oct; 67(10):720. PubMed ID: 20837652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High dose levels are not necessary in rodent studies to detect human carcinogens.
    Monro A; Davies TS
    Cancer Lett; 1993 Dec; 75(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 8313353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Panel discussion on the application of alternative models to cancer risk assessment.
    Pettit SD
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():191-5. PubMed ID: 11695557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short- and intermediate-term carcinogenicity testing--a review. Part 2: available experimental models.
    Enzmann H; Iatropoulos M; Brunnemann KD; Bomhard E; Ahr HJ; Schlueter G; Williams GM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):997-1013. PubMed ID: 9771563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the form of the cell growth rate function of the two-stage model for carcinogenesis.
    Charnley G; Wilson JD
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 369():291-301. PubMed ID: 1946526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alternative models for carcinogenicity testing: weight of evidence evaluations across models.
    Cohen SM
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():183-90. PubMed ID: 11695556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Summary of carcinogenic potency and positivity for 492 rodent carcinogens in the carcinogenic potency database.
    Gold LS; Slone TH; Bernstein L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1989 Feb; 79():259-72. PubMed ID: 2707207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Thresholds of carcinogenicity in the ED01 study.
    Andersen ME; Conolly RB; Gaylor DW
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):486-7; author reply 487-8. PubMed ID: 12874369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The nature of the heterozygous Trp53 knockout model for identification of mutagenic carcinogens.
    French J; Storer RD; Donehower LA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():24-9. PubMed ID: 11695559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strategies for the identification of rodent carcinogens by in vitro short-term tests.
    Zeiger E
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():261-71. PubMed ID: 2371299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.