395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 791437)
1. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wound complications after closure of abdominal incisions with Dexon or Vicryl. A randomized double-blind study.
Gammelgaard N; Jensen J
Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(5):505-8. PubMed ID: 6314720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The closure of abdominal wounds in cancer patients.
Gallitano AL; Kondi ES
J Surg Oncol; 1976; 8(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 136551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing wound complications: a clinical and experimental study.
Bucknall TE
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Mar; 65(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 6299161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of Prolene and Dexon.
Cameron AE; Gray RC; Talbot RW; Wyatt AP
Br J Surg; 1980 Jul; 67(7):487-8. PubMed ID: 6251939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early laparotomy wound dehiscence: a randomized comparison of three suture materials and two methods of fascial closure.
Savolainen H; Ristkari S; Mokka R
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 2851958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds.
Goligher JC; Irvin TT; Johnston D; De Dombal FT; Hill GL; Horrocks JC
Br J Surg; 1975 Oct; 62(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 1104042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
Bucknall TE; Ellis H
Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial.
Wissing J; van Vroonhoven TJ; Schattenkerk ME; Veen HF; Ponsen RJ; Jeekel J
Br J Surg; 1987 Aug; 74(8):738-41. PubMed ID: 3307992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal wound healing: a prospective clinical study.
Irvin TT; Stoddard CJ; Greaney MG; Duthie HL
Br Med J; 1977 Aug; 2(6083):351-2. PubMed ID: 329940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Role of modern absorbable suture materials in decreasing the occurrence of early complications after laparotomy].
Bohanes T; Neoral C; Klein J; Havlík R; Aujeský R; Král V
Rozhl Chir; 2002 Nov; 81 Suppl 1():S24-6. PubMed ID: 12666487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.
Bloemen A; van Dooren P; Huizinga BF; Hoofwijk AG
Br J Surg; 2011 May; 98(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21254041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abdominal wound closure with a continuous monofilament polypropylene suture. Experience with 1,000 consecutive cases.
Knight CD; Griffen FD
Arch Surg; 1983 Nov; 118(11):1305-8. PubMed ID: 6357147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closure of the abdominal fascia after clean and clean-contaminated laparotomy.
Larsen PN; Nielsen K; Schultz A; Mejdahl S; Larsen T; Moesgaard F
Acta Chir Scand; 1989 Sep; 155(9):461-4. PubMed ID: 2531963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.
Lewis RT; Wiegand FM
Can J Surg; 1989 May; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure.
Gys T; Hubens A
Acta Chir Belg; 1989; 89(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2530745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prolene and vicryl as synthetic sutures for intradermal suture technics].
Knote G; Bohmert H
Fortschr Med; 1978 Feb; 96(6):276-80. PubMed ID: 340370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adhesion formation to incisional abdominal wound in response to polyamide "6" and polyglactin "910" sutures.
Ansari AG
J Pak Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 42(8):184-5. PubMed ID: 1433796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
