These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants. Morris DR; Parker GF J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Are the rights of people with mental illness still important? Wilk RJ Soc Work; 1994 Mar; 39(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 8153759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication. Bursztajn H; Chanowitz B; Kaplan E; Gutheil TG; Hamm RM; Alexander V Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 1685680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The right to refuse treatment: recent Canadian developments. Gratzer TG; Matas M Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 7949413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients. Blais NR St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. From Rogers to Rivers: the rights of the mentally ill to refuse medication. Clayton EW Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(1):7-52. PubMed ID: 3332562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Legal "rites": criminalizing the mentally ill. Treffert DA Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1981; 3(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 7052934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review]. Nakajima N Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Incompetence to refuse treatment: a necessary condition for civil commitment. Lebegue B; Clark LD Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Aug; 138(8):1075-7. PubMed ID: 7258384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications. Knepper K Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A study of criminal defendants referred for multiple psychiatric examinations regarding their competency to stand trial. Bluestone H; Melella J; Baskin D J Forensic Sci; 1981 Apr; 26(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 7264586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Judges confirm the fundamental right to physical integrity]. Weber M Pflege Z; 2012 Oct; 65(10):626-8. PubMed ID: 23098036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada. Winick BJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Autonomy, self determination, the right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgment in medication decisions involving incompetent persons. Hermann DH Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 2286496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Adjusting Treatment for an Inmate-Patient Receiving Medication Involuntarily. Williams JB J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 26071513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]