These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7916834)

  • 1. Strategy choices in multiple-choice items.
    Skakun EN; Maguire TO; Cook DA
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S7-9. PubMed ID: 7916834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of items in five-option and extended-matching formats for assessment of diagnostic skills.
    Case SM; Swanson DB; Ripkey DR
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S1-3. PubMed ID: 7916811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of two multiple-choice question formats on the problem-solving strategies used by novices and experts.
    Coderre SP; Harasym P; Mandin H; Fick G
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Nov; 4():23. PubMed ID: 15530166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre-clinical medical students.
    Humbert AJ; Johnson MT; Miech E; Friedberg F; Grackin JA; Seidman PA
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 21609176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring higher cognitive levels by multiple choice questions: a myth?
    Ferland JJ; Dorval J; Levasseur L
    Med Educ; 1987 Mar; 21(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 3574161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Avoiding tokenism in health professional education.
    Bearman M; Ajjawi R
    Med Educ; 2013 Jan; 47(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 23278817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence.
    Lubarsky S; Charlin B; Cook DA; Chalk C; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2011 Apr; 45(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 21401680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of repeated use of objective structured clinical examination stations.
    Cohen R; Rothman AI; Ross J; Poldre P
    Acad Med; 1993 Oct; 68(10 Suppl):S73-5. PubMed ID: 8216640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-menu questions in computer-based assessments: a retrospective observational study.
    Cerutti B; Blondon K; Galetto A
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26861755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adopting programmatic feedback to enhance the learning of complex skills.
    Yusoff MS; Hadie SN; Abdul Rahim AF
    Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 48(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 24528391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new examination for the evaluation of diagnostic problem-solving.
    Case SM
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1981; 20():80-5. PubMed ID: 7347549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met?
    Berkson L
    Acad Med; 1993 Oct; 68(10 Suppl):S79-88. PubMed ID: 8216642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do underrepresented minority medical students differ from non-minority students in problem-solving ability?
    Tekian A; Han Y; Hruska L; Krainik AJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2001; 13(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 11302036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can STEEM be used to measure the educational environment within the operating theatre for undergraduate medical students?
    Nagraj S; Wall D; Jones E
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):642-7. PubMed ID: 17594557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'The Game': student 'teaching' objective structured clinical examinations in South Africa.
    Vogel J; Nel D; Chapman L; Burch VC
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):507-8. PubMed ID: 22515763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical skills remedial training for medical students.
    Chang A; Chou CL; Hauer KE
    Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 42(11):1118-9. PubMed ID: 18991999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A way to assess students' clinical reasoning.
    Aleluia IM; Carvalho PM; Menezes MS
    Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 44(11):1145-6. PubMed ID: 20963923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Framework for feedback: the peer mini-clinical examination as a formative assessment tool.
    Bennett D; Kelly M; O'Flynn S
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):512. PubMed ID: 22515770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasoning when it counts: students' rationales for action on a professionalism exam.
    Ginsburg SR; Regehr G; Mylopoulos M
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S40-3. PubMed ID: 17895688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.