These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7916835)

  • 1. Differential item functioning in checklist items from a standardized-patient-based examination.
    Clauser BE; Ross LP; Fletcher EA; Klass DJ; Finkbiner RG; King AM
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S72-4. PubMed ID: 7916835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistency of pass-fail decisions made with clinical clerkship ratings and standardized-patient examination scores.
    Vu NV; Henkle JQ; Colliver JA
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S40-1. PubMed ID: 7916823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to set passing standards for a standardized-patient examination of clinical competence.
    Colliver JA; Barnhart AJ; Marcy ML; Verhulst SJ
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S37-9. PubMed ID: 7916821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of items in five-option and extended-matching formats for assessment of diagnostic skills.
    Case SM; Swanson DB; Ripkey DR
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S1-3. PubMed ID: 7916811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Checklist content on a standardized patient assessment: an ex post facto review.
    Boulet JR; van Zanten M; de Champlain A; Hawkins RE; Peitzman SJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16871427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OSCE performance evaluations made by standardized patients: comparing checklist and global rating scores.
    Regehr G; Freeman R; Robb A; Missiha N; Heisey R
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S135-7. PubMed ID: 10536618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using factor analysis to evaluate checklist items.
    McKinley DW; Boulet JR
    Acad Med; 2005 Oct; 80(10 Suppl):S102-5. PubMed ID: 16199446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating construct equivalence and criterion-related validity for repeat examinees on a standardized patient examination.
    Raymond MR; Kahraman N; Swygert KA; Balog KP
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 21869669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ACEM Primary Examination is still relevant: Yes.
    Gunn B; Chu S
    Emerg Med Australas; 2018 Oct; 30(5):716-717. PubMed ID: 30153703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighting checklist items and station components on a large-scale OSCE: is it worth the effort?
    Sandilands DD; Gotzmann A; Roy M; Zumbo BD; De Champlain A
    Med Teach; 2014 Jul; 36(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 24787530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Critique of the USMLE clinical skills examination.
    Mehta NP; Kramer DB
    MedGenMed; 2005 May; 7(2):76. PubMed ID: 16369454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why does the MRCPsych examination need to change?
    Tyrer S; Oyebode F
    Br J Psychiatry; 2004 Mar; 184():197-9. PubMed ID: 14990516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liner programming method to construct equated item sets for implementation of periodical computer-based testing of Korean medical licensing examination.
    Seo DG; Kim MG; Kim NH; Shin HS; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():26. PubMed ID: 30336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of task exposure on repeat candidate scores in a high-stakes standardized patient assessment.
    Boulet JR; McKinley DW; Whelan GP; Hambleton RK
    Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 14612253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tackling the ACEM Primary Examination: A four-stage approach.
    Douglas A
    Emerg Med Australas; 2018 Oct; 30(5):714-715. PubMed ID: 30175508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of pass/fail classifications made with scores from the NBME standardized-patient examination and Part II examination.
    Clauser BE; Ripkey D; Fletcher B; King A; Klass D; Orr N
    Acad Med; 1993 Oct; 68(10 Suppl):S7-9. PubMed ID: 8216638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of clinically discriminating, evidence-based checklist items on the reliability of scores from an Internal Medicine residency OSCE.
    Daniels VJ; Bordage G; Gierl MJ; Yudkowsky R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Oct; 19(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 24449122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ACEM Primary Examination is still relevant: No.
    Grayson V
    Emerg Med Australas; 2018 Oct; 30(5):718-719. PubMed ID: 30240075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using tagged items to detect threats to security in a nationally administered standardized patient examination.
    MacMillan MK; De Champlain AF; Klass DJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 10536593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Kang SY; Kim KS; Kim GH; Choi YH; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():20. PubMed ID: 28900070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.