These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7916980)

  • 61. Startup performance of the traveling wave versus standing wave linear accelerator.
    Buchgeister M; Nüsslin F
    Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):493-5. PubMed ID: 9571616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Arc technique for total-body irradiation by a 42-MV betatron.
    Engler MJ; Feldman MI; Spira J
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(6):524-5. PubMed ID: 412049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Investigation of the use of external aluminium targets for portal imaging in a medical accelerator using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation.
    Kim H; Kim B; Baek J; Oh Y; Yun S; Jang H
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170376. PubMed ID: 29338304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Depth dose characteristics of 24-MV x-ray beams at extended SSD.
    Jani SK; Pennington EC
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 1904530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessment of the setup dependence of detector response functions for mega-voltage linear accelerators.
    Fox C; Simon T; Simon B; Dempsey JF; Kahler D; Palta JR; Liu C; Yan G
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 20229856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Comparison of dosimetric properties of 15-MV-photons and 14-MeV-neutrons in external stereotaxic convergence therapy].
    Höver KH; Hesse BM; Oetzel D; Rhein B; Lorenz WJ; Engelhart R; Kimmig B; Wannenmacher M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Nov; 167(11):651-7. PubMed ID: 1962279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Generation and verification of QFix kVue Calypso-compatible couch top model for a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator with FFF beams.
    Gardner SJ; Gulam M; Song K; Li H; Huang Y; Zhao B; Qin Y; Snyder K; Kim J; Gordon J; Chetty IJ; Wen N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):163–180. PubMed ID: 26219010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams.
    Javedan K; Feygelman V; Zhang RR; Moros EG; Correa CR; Trotti A; Li W; Zhang GG
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24662096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.
    Yan C; Combine AG; Bednarz G; Lalonde RJ; Hu B; Dickens K; Wynn R; Pavord DC; Saiful Huq M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):195-209. PubMed ID: 28834214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of low-density lateral interfaces on soft-tissue doses.
    Hunt MA; Desobry GE; Fowble B; Coia LR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 9069324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The flatness of Siemens linear accelerator x-ray fields.
    Faddegon BA; O'Brien P; Mason DL
    Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 10076978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Superficial and peripheral dose in compensator-based FFF beam IMRT.
    Zhang DG; Feygelman V; Moros EG; Latifi K; Hoffe S; Frakes J; Zhang GG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 28291940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Calculation of k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) for several small detectors and for two linear accelerators using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Satariano N
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6513-27. PubMed ID: 22149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Contamination of a 15-MV photon beam by electrons and scattered photons.
    Mackie TR; Scrimger JW
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 6806853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The validity of the approximation method "area/perimeter" as applied to 8 and 25-MV photon beams.
    Osman GE; Tsung P
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):233-4. PubMed ID: 99763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of measured and calculated dose for asymmetric x-ray beams defined by independently movable collimators.
    Prasad SC; Krol A; Bassano DA
    Med Dosim; 1996; 21(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 8807611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
    Cardenas CE; Nitsch PL; Kudchadker RJ; Howell RM; Kry SF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Dosimetry of an in-line kilovoltage imaging system and implementation in treatment planning.
    Dzierma Y; Nuesken F; Otto W; Alaei P; Licht N; Rübe C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(4):913-9. PubMed ID: 24456996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. In modern linacs monitor units should be defined in water at 10 cm depth rather than at d
    Van den Heuvel F; Wu Q; Cai J
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4789-4792. PubMed ID: 29807394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.