These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7917272)

  • 1. Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Guest CS; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 22(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7917272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fastpac visual field screening.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 2(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8963914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields?
    Mills RP; Barnebey HS; Migliazzo CV; Li Y
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Sep; 101(9):1596-603. PubMed ID: 8090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Jun; 100(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 8510911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.
    O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
    Nordmann JP; Denis P; Nguer Y; Mouton-Chopin D; Saraux H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1994; 4(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 7950333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Flanagan JG; Moss ID; Wild JM; Hudson C; Prokopich L; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 231(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 8224946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
    Singh MD; Jain K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study.
    Topouzis F; Coleman AL; Yu F; Mavroudis L; Anastasopoulos E; Koskosas A; Pappas T; Dimitrakos S; Wilson MR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 15013863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
    Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A; Aspinall P; Taguri A; King AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.