These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7917697)
1. Evaluation of six minute walking test in patients with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers. Provenier F; Jordaens L Br Heart J; 1994 Aug; 72(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 7917697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shuttle walking test: a new approach for evaluating patients with pacemakers. Payne GE; Skehan JD Heart; 1996 Apr; 75(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 8705773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block. Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it? Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence. Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block. Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is accurate rate response programming necessary? Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life in patients with rate responsive pacemakers: a randomized, cross-over study. Oto MA; Müderrisoglu H; Ozin MB; Korkmaz ME; Karamehmetoglu A; Oram A; Oram E; Ugurlu S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 May; 14(5 Pt 1):800-6. PubMed ID: 1712957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experience with Sensolog 703: a new activity sensing rate responsive pacemaker. Lau CP; Tse WS; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1444-55. PubMed ID: 2462222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of transcutaneous triggering of conventional implanted pulse generators by an activity-sensing pacemaker for predicting effectiveness of rate response pacing. Fetter J; Benditt DG; Mianulli M Am J Cardiol; 1988 Nov; 62(13):901-5. PubMed ID: 3177238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physiological benefits of a pacemaker with dual chamber pacing at low heart rates and single chamber rate responsive pacing during exercise. French WJ; Haskell RJ; Wesley GW; Florio J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1840-5. PubMed ID: 2463556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers. Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing. Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the work capacity and relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance associated with activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing. Faerestrand S; Breivik K; Ohm OJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1277-90. PubMed ID: 2446275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices. Sulke N; Dritsas A; Bostock J; Wells A; Morris R; Sowton E Br Heart J; 1992 Jan; 67(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 1739528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DDD versus VVIR pacing in patients, ages 70 and over, with complete heart block. Ouali S; Neffeti E; Ghoul K; Hammas S; Kacem S; Gribaa R; Remedi F; Boughzela E Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 33(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 20015129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of DDD versus VVIR pacing modes in elderly patients with atrioventricular block. Kılıçaslan B; Vatansever Ağca F; Kılıçaslan EE; Kınay O; Tigen K; Cakır C; Nazlı C; Ergene O Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2012 Jun; 40(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22951849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ventricular rate-adaptive pacing in the elderly. Lau CP; Wong CK; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL Eur Heart J; 1992 Jul; 13(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 1644080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial clinical experience with a new dual sensor SSIR pacemaker controlled by body activity and minute ventilation. Alt E; Combs W; Fotuhi P; Bambl E; Wahlstrand J; Willhaus R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1487-95. PubMed ID: 7479170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing mode on quality-of-life and cardiopulmonary performance in complete heart block. Deharo JC; Badier M; Thirion X; Ritter P; Provenier F; Graux P; Guillot C; Mugica J; Jordaens L; Djiane P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1320-6. PubMed ID: 8880795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]