These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7918814)

  • 1. Confounder prevalence and stratum-specific relative risks: implications for misclassified and missing confounders.
    Marshall RJ
    Epidemiology; 1994 Jul; 5(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 7918814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recovering true risks when multilevel exposure and covariables are both misclassified.
    Weinkam JJ; Rosenbaum WL; Sterling TD
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 150(8):886-91. PubMed ID: 10522660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect on the stratum-specific odds ratios of nondifferential misclassification of a dichotomous covariate.
    Cox B; Elwood JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Jan; 133(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 1815535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias due to non-differential misclassification of polytomous confounders.
    Brenner H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stratification for confounding--part 1: the Mantel-Haenszel formula.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 116(4):c317-21. PubMed ID: 20664286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A sensitivity analysis to separate bias due to confounding from bias due to predicting misclassification by a variable that does both.
    Lash TL; Silliman RA
    Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 10955407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification.
    Savitz DA; Barón AE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 May; 129(5):1062-71. PubMed ID: 2705426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusted odds ratios for case-control studies with missing confounder data in controls.
    Suissa S; Edwardes MD
    Epidemiology; 1997 May; 8(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 9115022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure-dependent misclassification of exposure in interaction analyses.
    Lundberg M; Hallqvist J; Diderichsen F
    Epidemiology; 1999 Sep; 10(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 10468429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm.
    Schuster T; Pang M; Platt RW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1004-7. PubMed ID: 25866189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aspects of misclassification of confounding factors.
    Ahlbom A; Steineck G
    Am J Ind Med; 1992; 21(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 1553979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model specification and unmeasured confounders in partially ecologic analyses based on group proportions of exposed.
    Björk J; Strömberg U
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2005 Jun; 31(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 15999570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditions for confounding of interactions.
    Liu A; Abrahamowicz M; Siemiatycki J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Mar; 25(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 26676843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect adjustment of relative risks of an exposure with multiple categories for an unmeasured confounder.
    Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Blair A
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):801-807. PubMed ID: 30297163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misclassification of covariates.
    Walker AM; Lanes SF
    Stat Med; 1991 Aug; 10(8):1181-96. PubMed ID: 1925151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.
    Cepeda MS; Boston R; Farrar JT; Strom BL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 158(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 12882951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.