These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7920399)

  • 21. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glass ionomer cement surface protection.
    Serra MC; Navarro MF; Freitas SF; Carvalho RM; Cury JA; Retief DH
    Am J Dent; 1994 Aug; 7(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 7986436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in vitro comparison of micro leakage in three glass ionomer cements used as retrograde filling materials.
    Rosales JI; Vallecillo M; Osorio R; Bravo M; Toledano M
    Int Dent J; 1996 Feb; 46(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 8744913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
    Beznos C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage resistance of glutaraldehyde-containing adhesives.
    Crim GA; Schmidt ED
    Am J Dent; 1993 Jun; 6(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 8240776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system--results at three years.
    Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11203771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.