These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7922071)

  • 1. Reducing the risk of viral transmission at operation by electronic monitoring of the surgeon-patient barrier.
    Macintyre IM; Currie JS; Smith DN; Anderson ID; Cadossi R
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jul; 81(7):1076-8. PubMed ID: 7922071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.
    Hentz VR; Stephanides M; Boraldi A; Tessari R; Isani R; Cadossi R; Biscione R; Massari L; Traina GC
    World J Surg; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1101-8. PubMed ID: 11571942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hazards to surgeons in trauma and elective orthopaedic surgery: use of an electronic device to warn of intraoperative glove perforations.
    Hamer AJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Sep; 74(5):309-11. PubMed ID: 1416699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glove and gown effects on intraoperative bacterial contamination.
    Ward WG; Cooper JM; Lippert D; Kablawi RO; Neiberg RH; Sherertz RJ
    Ann Surg; 2014 Mar; 259(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 24045444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Electronic detection of breaks in the surgeon-patient barrier. Evaluation of protective clothing in visceral surgery].
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Lemaire C; Fabry J
    Ann Chir; 2000 May; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 10900738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First clinical study of a new virus-inhibiting surgical glove.
    Caillot JL; Voiglio EJ
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2008 Jan; 138(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 18224492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing accidental injuries during surgery.
    Edlich RF; Long WB; Gubler K; Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Wallis AG; Dahlstrom JJ; Clark JJ; Cantrell HS; Rhoads SK; Lin KY
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 21284595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.
    Caillot JL; Paparel P; Arnal E; Schreiber V; Voiglio EJ
    World J Surg; 2006 Jan; 30(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16369716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system.
    Laine T; Aarnio P
    Am J Surg; 2001 Jun; 181(6):564-6. PubMed ID: 11513787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving.
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Abidi H; Fabry J
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1387-90. PubMed ID: 10583283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gown-glove interface: a possible solution to the danger zone.
    Meyer KK; Beck WC
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 16(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 7594395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protective gloves for use in high-risk patients: how much do they affect the dexterity of the surgeon?
    Phillips AM; Birch NC; Ribbans WJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Mar; 79(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 9135240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving.
    Laine T; Kaipia A; Santavirta J; Aarnio P
    Scand J Surg; 2004; 93(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 15116826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.
    Jensen SL; Kristensen B; Fabrin K
    Eur J Surg; 1997 Mar; 163(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 9085056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies of determinants of glove hole puncture during electrosurgery.
    Neal JG; London SD; Kheir JN; Hunter FP; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 8953394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of surgical glove perforation after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.
    Walczak DA; Zakrzewski J; Pawelczak D; Grobelski B; Pasieka Z
    Acta Chir Belg; 2013; 113(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 24494469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New advances in electronic devices for hole detection.
    Cox MJ; Bromberg WJ; Zura RD; Foresman PA; Morgan RG; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 10147452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of glove failure during orthopedic operations and the protective effect of double gloves.
    Thanni LO; Yinusa W
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2003 Dec; 95(12):1184-8. PubMed ID: 14717474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.
    Thomas S; Agarwal M; Mehta G
    Postgrad Med J; 2001 Jul; 77(909):458-60. PubMed ID: 11423598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A whole-glove method for the evaluation of surgical gloves as barriers to viruses.
    Nelson JR; Roming TA; Bennett JK
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 10594292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.