These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7924266)

  • 1. Comparing several proportions when the exposure variable is either ordinal or ratio which has been grouped into discrete classes.
    Lee J
    Comput Biol Med; 1994 May; 24(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 7924266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximally selected chi-square statistics for ordinal variables.
    Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2006 Jun; 48(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 16845908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A SAS program to perform the chi-square test for trend in proportions when the exposure variable is either quantitative or ordinal.
    Lee J
    Asia Pac J Public Health; 1990; 4(2-3):192. PubMed ID: 2278771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A SAS macro for residual deviance of ordinal regression analysis.
    Wan JY; Wang W; Bromberg J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Dec; 45(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 7736732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact 95% confidence intervals for differences in binomial proportions.
    Fagan T
    Comput Biol Med; 1999 Jan; 29(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 10207656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits.
    Daly L
    Comput Biol Med; 1992 Sep; 22(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 1424580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quasi-exact test for comparing two binomial proportions.
    Hirji KF; Tan SJ; Elashoff RM
    Stat Med; 1991 Jul; 10(7):1137-53. PubMed ID: 1876801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A SAS procedure for exact probability testing of difference between sample and population proportion.
    Lee J; Lee HP; Fong NP
    Comput Biol Med; 1989; 19(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 2706948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a clinical prediction model for an ordinal outcome: the World Health Organization Multicentre Study of Clinical Signs and Etiological agents of Pneumonia, Sepsis and Meningitis in Young Infants. WHO/ARI Young Infant Multicentre Study Group.
    Harrell FE; Margolis PA; Gove S; Mason KE; Mulholland EK; Lehmann D; Muhe L; Gatchalian S; Eichenwald HF
    Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):909-44. PubMed ID: 9595619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loglinear analysis of cross-classified ordinal data: applications in developmental research.
    Green JA
    Child Dev; 1988 Feb; 59(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 3277823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistics review 8: Qualitative data - tests of association.
    Bewick V; Cheek L; Ball J
    Crit Care; 2004 Feb; 8(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 14975045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximally selected chi-square statistics and binary splits of nominal variables.
    Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):838-48. PubMed ID: 17094347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dealing with discreteness: making 'exact' confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact.
    Agresti A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 12617505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing a sample proportion with a specified population proportion based on the mid-P method.
    Tai BC; Lee J; Lee HP
    Psychiatry Res; 1997 Aug; 71(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 9271793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact power calculations when the dependent variable is a single proportion and the number of events is small.
    Hoehler FK
    Comput Biol Med; 1995 Sep; 25(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 8575162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical research XVII. χ(2) test, from the expected to the observed].
    Rivas-Ruiz R; Castelán-Martínez OD; Pérez M; Talavera JO
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 24144149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A SAS macro for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1997 Jul; 53(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 9230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.