These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 792431)

  • 1. Significance of the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle to prosthodontics.
    DiPietro GJ; Moergeli JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Dec; 36(6):624-35. PubMed ID: 792431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frankfort Mandibular Plane Angle: Critically Appraised Topic (CAT).
    Goldstein G; Goodacre C
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(S1):61-63. PubMed ID: 33783089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A simplified technique for the clinical measurement of the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle].
    Karkazis HC; Chai JY
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1988; 32(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 3153695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.
    Lee YS; Kim YK; Yun PY; Larson BE; Lee NK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 27060493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of occlusion as related to the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle.
    DiPietro GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Oct; 38(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 269281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of the relationship between mandibular alveolar bone loss and a low Frankfort-mandibular plane angle.
    Unger JW; Ellinger CW; Gunsolley JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 1791564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment change comparisons between skeletal Class I and II white adolescents with 3 different vertical divergencies-part 1: Frankfort-Mandibular Incisor Angle (FMIA) and soft-tissue profile.
    Kang HK; Liu T; Kaczynski R; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Sep; 164(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 37003905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between lower arch spacing/crowding and facial height and depth.
    Leighton BC; Hunter WS
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Nov; 82(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 6961812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning.
    Tsunori M; Mashita M; Kasai K
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 9851354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphologic study of the mandibular fossa and the eminence of the temporomandibular joint in relation to the facial structures.
    Ikai A; Sugisaki M; Young-Sung K; Tanabe H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):634-8. PubMed ID: 9423695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):41-9. PubMed ID: 27653263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating diagnostic performance of three cephalometric vertical parameters.
    Azeez SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 37417057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative long term post-treatment changes in hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 patients with early cervical traction treatment.
    Junkin JB; Andria LM
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 11843274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements.
    Braun S; Bantleon HP; Hnat WP; Freudenthaler JW; Marcotte MR; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8526297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of mandibular and chin morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion in different vertical facial types].
    Shu Y; Liu J; Chen J; Fang CH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Apr; 20(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 21566872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correlation between mandibular angle and inclination angle of the posterior wall of the articular eminence of the temporo-mandibular joint].
    Kulikowska J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1969; 15():219-32. PubMed ID: 4907659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of mandibular rotation on molar position.
    Kristofor C; Skarin D; Forbes D; Chwa K
    Northwest Dent Res; 1997; 7(2):16-27. PubMed ID: 9487908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular rest position in subjects with high and low mandibular plane angles.
    Peterson TM; Rugh JD; McIver JE
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Apr; 83(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 6573145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.