These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 792432)

  • 1. Retentive properties of post and core systems.
    Newburg RE; Pameijer CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Dec; 36(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 792432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B; Pagnillo MK; Schulman A; Hittelman E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 10898840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the retentive strengths of dowels of three different diameters in combination with one or two different-sized threaded pins.
    Orkin DA; Louw NP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Feb; 63(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 2406423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Lee JK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 8511280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the retentive strength of two cast gold pin techniques.
    Chan KC; Boyer DB; Reinhardt JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Nov; 42(5):527-9. PubMed ID: 385851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence ofvertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-coresystems.
    Sirimai S; Riis DN; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 10050112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retentive strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts with composite resin cores: Effect of remaining coronal structure and root canal dentin conditioning protocols.
    Saker S; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):856-61. PubMed ID: 26384532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of cast crowns cemented to amalgam and composite resin cores.
    Hormati AA; Denehy GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 May; 45(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 7012321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth.
    Abou-Rass M
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():99-107. PubMed ID: 1520948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retentive properties of threaded split-shaft posts with titanium-reinforced composite cement.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):910-2. PubMed ID: 1494118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC; Hart S; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of strengths of five core and post-and-core systems.
    Möllersten L; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 11890028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
    Solomon CS; Osman YI
    SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of three post and core systems with and without etching.
    Gelfand M; Smith DC
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 55(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 2496909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of design of pre-fabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials.
    Hochman N; Feinzaig I; Zalkind M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 12791155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
    Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth.
    King PA; Setchell DJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 17(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 2283555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.