232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7924702)
1. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Luzi P; Bruni A; Mangiavacchi P; Cevenini G; Marini D; Tosi P
Cytometry; 1994 Jun; 18(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7924702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas. A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Dugan JM; Hamilton WH; Loda M; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):428-32. PubMed ID: 1329051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy analysis in breast carcinoma. Comparison of unfixed and fixed tissue analyzed by image and flow cytometry.
Ottesen GL; Christensen IJ; Larsen JK; Larsen J; Christiansen J; Baldetorp B; Linden T; Hansen B; Andersen JA
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):413-22. PubMed ID: 9349901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Dawson AE; Norton JA; Weinberg DS
Am J Pathol; 1990 May; 136(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 1972000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of DNA ploidy in 115 fresh-frozen breast carcinomas by image analysis versus flow cytometry.
Ghali VS; Liau S; Teplitz C; Prudente R
Cancer; 1992 Dec; 70(11):2668-72. PubMed ID: 1423197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by image and flow cytometry in breast cancer fine-needle cytopunctures.
Spyratos F; Briffod M
Mod Pathol; 1997 Jun; 10(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 9195572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of image analysis with flow cytometry for DNA content analysis in pigmented lesions of the skin.
Sangueza OP; Hyder DM; White CR; Pallander J; Perkins M; Remple N; Bakke A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Feb; 14(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 1558616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates.
Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Fernö M; Alanen K; Delle U; Falkmer U; Hansson-Aggesjö B; Höckenström T; Lindgren A; Mossberg L
Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 7587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Steroid receptor heterogeneity in relation to DNA index in breast cancer: a multiparameter flow cytometric approach on paraffin-embedded tumor samples.
Leers MP; Nap M
Breast J; 2001; 7(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 11678803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image analysis confirmation of DNA aneuploidy in flow cytometric DNA distributions having a wide coefficient of variation of the G0/G1 peak.
McFadden PW; Clowry LJ; Daehnert K; Hause LL; Koethe SM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 93(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 2327365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of DNA content estimated by flow and image cytometry in breast tumor samples.
Jaszcz-Gruchała A; Swiatkiewicz I; Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Niezabitowski A
Pol J Pathol; 2001; 52(1-2):15-9. PubMed ID: 11505676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AgNORs in ductal breast cancer: correlation with ploidy and S-phase fraction by DNA flow cytometry.
Borgiani L; Cogorno P; Oliviero J; Toso F; Gambini G; Tunesi G; Canepa M
Eur J Histochem; 1994; 38(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 7524814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of proliferation activity in breast carcinoma by flow cytometry analysis of S-phase and quantitative analysis of MIB-1.
Masood S; Bui MM; Lu L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 9846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphometric determination of AgNORs in breast carcinoma. Correlation with flow cytometry and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
Bellotti M; Elsner B; Kahn A; Bezodnick L; Pisilli L; Greco P
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Apr; 19(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9113306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of sample size on image cytometry of DNA ploidy measurements.
Boudry C; Herlin P; Coster M; Chermant JL
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Jun; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10560493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative DNA analysis of solid tumors by flow cytometric and image analyses of touch imprints and flow cell suspensions.
Elsheikh TM; Silverman JF; McCool JW; Riley RS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Sep; 98(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 1529964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caveats in the estimation of DNA-ploidy in paraffin embedded specimens of primary prostate cancer and lymph node metastases by flow and image cytometry.
Berner A; Danielsen HE; Juul NO; Juul ME; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Nesland JM; Fosså SD
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Nov; 5(6):339-52. PubMed ID: 8305330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
