232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7924702)
21. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer.
Kaern J; Wetteland J; Tropé CG; Farrants GW; Juhng SW; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Danielsen HE
Cytometry; 1992; 13(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 1576895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [DNA cytometry in breast carcinoma. Review of method and value in assessing prognosis].
Sinn HP; Haag D; Ehemann V; Magener A; Goerttler K; Bastert G; Otto HF
Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9157400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image cytometric DNA analysis in human breast cancer analysis may add prognostic information in diploid cases with low S-phase fraction by flow cytometry.
Baldetorp B; Fernö M; Fallenius A; Fallenius-Vecchi G; Idvall I; Olsson H; Sigurdsson H; Akerman M; Killander D
Cytometry; 1992; 13(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 1451590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA flow cytometry but not telomerase activity as predictor of disease-free survival in pT1-2/N0/G2 breast cancer.
Pinto AE; André S; Pereira T; Silva G; Soares J
Pathobiology; 2006; 73(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16943686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in lymph-node-negative breast cancer by image and flow cytometric analysis.
Peiró G; Lerma E; Climent MA; Seguí MA; Alonso MC; Prat J
Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 9071729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: a comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Dugan J; Hamilton WM; Cook L; Heatley G; Kamat B; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1991 Mar; 4(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 2047381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. DNA ploidy in breast lesions. A comparative study using two commercial image analysis systems and flow cytometry.
Wilbur DC; Zakowski MF; Kosciol CM; Sojda DF; Pastuszak WT
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1990 Feb; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 2302308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. c-erbB-2/neu protein expression, DNA ploidy and S phase in breast cancer.
Dittadi R; Calderazzo F; Cabrelle A; Di Fresco S; Gion M; Chieco-Bianchi L
Cell Prolif; 1996 Jul; 29(7):403-12. PubMed ID: 8883464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DNA ploidy, proliferation, and neu-oncogene protein overexpression in breast carcinoma.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Loda M; Bosari S; Dugan JM; Hamilton W; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1992 Jan; 5(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1347424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Expression of centrosomal tubulins associated with DNA ploidy in breast premalignant lesions and carcinoma.
Niu Y; Wang S; Liu T; Zhang T; Wei X; Wang Y; Jiang L
Pathol Res Pract; 2013 Apr; 209(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 23523041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases.
Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP
Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Flow cytometry and interactive image cytometry in endometrial carcinoma. A comparative and prognostic study.
Strang P; Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Stendahl U; Valdes del Campo M; Tribukait B
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(2):783-8. PubMed ID: 2064334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. DNA quantitation of distal bile duct carcinoma measured by image and flow cytometry.
Rijken AM; Belien JA; van Gulik TM; Polak MM; Offerhaus GJ; Gouma DJ; Baak JP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 10560507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of a new slide-based laser scanning cytometer for DNA analysis of tumors. Comparison with flow cytometry and image analysis.
Martin-Reay DG; Kamentsky LA; Weinberg DS; Hollister KA; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 7942599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic significance of morphological parameters and flow cytometric DNA analysis in carcinoma of the breast.
Visscher DW; Zarbo RJ; Greenawald KA; Crissman JD
Pathol Annu; 1990; 25 Pt 1():171-210. PubMed ID: 2153277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative DNA analysis of breast cancer by flow cytometry and image analysis.
Borgiani L; Cogorno P; Toso F; Gallo L; Buccaran G; Rovida S; Canepa M
Pathologica; 1994 Aug; 86(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 7535909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative analysis of DNA ploidy and proliferative index in fine needle aspirates of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Wojcik EM; Katz RL; Johnston DA; Sembera D; el-Naggar A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1993 Jun; 15(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8347254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative DNA analysis by image cytometry and flow cytometry in non-small cell lung cancer.
Yamamoto T; Horiguchi H; Kamma H; Noro M; Ogata T; Inage Y; Akaogi E; Mitsui K; Hori M; Isobe M
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 Nov; 85(11):1171-7. PubMed ID: 7829404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
