These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7926149)

  • 1. Ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technologies. By the Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society.
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Nov; 62(5 Suppl 1):1S-125S. PubMed ID: 7926149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Oct; 70(4 Suppl 3):1S-13S. PubMed ID: 9805512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive technologies: some ethical considerations for HECs.
    Rothman CM
    HEC Forum; 1989; 1(5):261-74. PubMed ID: 10304276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. Ethics Committee of The American Fertility Society.
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6 Suppl 2):1S-104S. PubMed ID: 2189753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. By the Ethics Committee (1986-87) of The American Fertility Society in light of Instruction on the Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Feb; 49(2 Suppl 1):1S-7S. PubMed ID: 3276566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview of the reports of the Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society.
    Spicker SF
    J Med Philos; 1989 Oct; 14(5):477-80. PubMed ID: 2691610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technologies, ads, and ethics: philosophical, ethical, and clinical perspectives on the use of advertising in reproductive medicine. A conference held by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction.
    Macklin R; White GB
    Womens Health Issues; 1997; 7(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 9203857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Looking back, looking forward: the legacy of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER).
    Kalfoglou AL
    Womens Health Issues; 2000; 10(3):92-104. PubMed ID: 10828543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will we be taught ethics by our clones? The mutations of the living, from endocrine disruptors to genetics.
    Vandelac L; Bacon MH
    Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Dec; 13(4):571-92. PubMed ID: 10718712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Herz EK
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 12(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 2652103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Right and ethics in reproductive medicine--medical and ethical aspects].
    Hepp H
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Jul; 96(6-7):396-402. PubMed ID: 12219491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Financial ''risk-sharing'' or refund programs in assisted reproduction: an Ethics Committee opinion.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2024 May; 121(5):783-786. PubMed ID: 38276940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. By the Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society.
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3 Suppl 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 3743811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical regulation and the new reproductive technologies in Sri Lanka: perspectives of ethics committee members.
    Simpson B
    Ceylon Med J; 2001 Jun; 46(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 11727577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Turkey IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines.
    Calik KY; Bulut HK
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32207418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ethical considerations on new developments in reproductive medicine].
    Rehmann-Sutter C; Wienroth M
    Ther Umsch; 2009 Dec; 66(12):807-11. PubMed ID: 19950059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The duties of ethical committees applied to human reproduction.
    Eisenberg VH; Schenker JG
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Oct; 13(9):689-97. PubMed ID: 8947814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FIGO Committee for the study of ethical aspects of human reproduction. Guidelines regarding informed consent. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
    Schenker JG
    Ginekol Pol; 1996 Nov; 67(11):581-2. PubMed ID: 9289447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The credibility of the profession.
    Gleicher N
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Nov; 12(10):661-2. PubMed ID: 8624420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidance on qualifications for fertility counselors: a committee opinion.
    Practice Committee and the Mental Health Professional Group of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1411-1415. PubMed ID: 33838872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.