201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7926572)
1. [The advantages of CO2 laser use in treatment of cervix dysplasia].
Küppers V; Degen KW; Dominik S; Sert S; Somville T
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jul; 54(7):401-5. PubMed ID: 7926572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Treatment and after-care of HIV patients with cervix dysplasia].
Küppers V; Eckardstein S; Koldovsky U; Somville T; Bender HG
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Nov; 54(11):612-6. PubMed ID: 8719003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with the carbon dioxide laser.
Popkin DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 145(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 6401397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Antonakou A; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Sakellaropoulos G; Antsaklis A
In Vivo; 2011; 25(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 21709016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [LASER CONISATION VS. COLD KNIFE CONISATION FOR CIN].
Karagyozov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27514128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Laser therapy of the uterine cervix].
Schumacher A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1994; 116(8):484-7. PubMed ID: 7941819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Our and foreign experience in surgical treatment of CIN III-cold knife conisation versus LLETZ].
Boyadzhieva M; Atanassova I; Dimitrova V; Zaharieva S; Tankova T; Grozeva G; Todorova K; Stoykova V; Kedikova S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 20734649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loop diathermy excision compared with cervical laser vaporisation for the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial.
Dey P; Gibbs A; Arnold DF; Saleh N; Hirsch PJ; Woodman CB
BJOG; 2002 Apr; 109(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 12013158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Conservative treatment of grade 3 intra-epithelial cervical neoplasms. Comparative study of CO2 laser vaporization, laser conization and cold scalpel conization].
Sagot P; Lopes P; Audoin AF; Dantal F; Anger P; Lerat MF
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(5):661-74. PubMed ID: 3148003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser conization assisted by crypt visualization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bandieramonte G; Lomonico S; Quattrone P; Stefanon B; Merola M; Bucci A
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 9469287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [COLPOSCOPY ASSISTED LASER MICROSURGERY FOR CERVICAL PATHOLOGY].
Karagyozov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2015; 54(9):9-16. PubMed ID: 26863789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of cold-knife conization without hemostatic sutures].
Rimailho J; Puyuelo L; Escourrou G; Hoff J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8040571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.
Lili E; Chatzistamatiou K; Kalpaktsidou-Vakiani A; Moysiadis T; Agorastos T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9719. PubMed ID: 29369205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regeneration of uterine cervix at 6 months after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):678-84. PubMed ID: 22313794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III treated with CO2 laser. Cytological, colposcopic and histopathological follow-up].
Trejo Solorzano O; de la Torre Rendón F; Hurtado Reyna H; Chairez Vela LF
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1994 Apr; 62():113-20. PubMed ID: 8034219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
