369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 792673)
1. Biomaterials and biocompatibility.
Williams DF
Med Prog Technol; 1976 Jul; 4(1-2):31-42. PubMed ID: 792673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty.
Hallab N; Link HD; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S139-52. PubMed ID: 14560185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [New materials improve joint prostheses. Metals, polymers, ceramics and composite materials extend the durability].
Carlsson L; Johansson C
Lakartidningen; 1999 May; 96(20):2458-60, 2463-7. PubMed ID: 10380491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Biodeterioration and corrosion of metallic implants and prostheses].
López GD
Medicina (B Aires); 1993; 53(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 8114635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of new materials results in improved prostheses. Metals, polymers, ceramics and composite materials extend durability].
Carlsson L; Johansson C
Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Oct; 161(42):5786-92. PubMed ID: 10578693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Biomaterials].
Peronneau P; Nakache M
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1981; 175(5):598-635. PubMed ID: 6456791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Current requirements for polymeric biomaterials in ear, nose and throat medicine].
Sternberg K
Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 May; 88 Suppl 1():S1-11. PubMed ID: 19353451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An overview of implant materials.
Simon JP; Fabry G
Acta Orthop Belg; 1991; 57(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2038938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Future materials for foot surgery.
Latour RA
Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1995 Jul; 12(3):519-44. PubMed ID: 7553538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomaterial and design concepts to minimize wear in total joint arthroplasties.
Lemons JE
Semin Arthroplasty; 1994 Jan; 5(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10146634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomaterials in total joint replacement.
Katti KS
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2004 Dec; 39(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 15556342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the biocompatibility of degradable metallic materials: state-of-the-art and focus on the potential of genetic regulation.
Purnama A; Hermawan H; Couet J; Mantovani D
Acta Biomater; 2010 May; 6(5):1800-7. PubMed ID: 20176149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue reactions to metallic wear and corrosion products in human patients.
Winter GD
J Biomed Mater Res; 1974; 8(3):11-26. PubMed ID: 4455693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Future prospects for biomaterials.
Williams DF
Biomed Eng; 1975 Jun; 10(6):207-12,218. PubMed ID: 1139027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The golden anniversary of titanium biomaterials.
Williams D
Med Device Technol; 2001 Sep; 12(7):8-11. PubMed ID: 12938552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the biological compatibility of joint prostheses].
Pizzoferrato A; Ciapetti G; Stea S; Pratelli L; Tarabusi C
Chir Organi Mov; 1988; 73(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 3048932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biocompatibility of materials for total joint replacement.
Escalas F; Galante J; Rostoker W
J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 Mar; 10(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 1254613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experimental study of metallic bone and joint prostheses with plasma-sprayed ceramic coating].
Huang GK; Cao MJ
Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 1590032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corrosion and other electrochemical aspects of biomaterials.
Bundy KJ
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1994; 22(3-4):139-251. PubMed ID: 8598129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Friction and wear properties of polymer, metal, and ceramic prosthetic joint materials evaluated on a multichannel screening device.
McKellop H; Clarke I; Markolf K; Amstutz H
J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Sep; 15(5):619-53. PubMed ID: 12659132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
