168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 792759)
1. Wound disruption.
Lacey CG; Morrow CP; Disaia PJ; Townsend DE
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 48(6):730. PubMed ID: 792759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal wound dehiscence.
Hugh TB
Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 2183750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal wound closure.
Carlson DC; Wornom IL; Aldrete JS
Ala J Med Sci; 1984 Jan; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 6367517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Closing of median laparotomies: interrupted versus continuous sutures using slow absorption thread].
Meyer P
Helv Chir Acta; 1984 Jun; 51(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6381423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.
Dodson MK; Magann EF; Sullivan DL; Meeks GR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 8272296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wound healing in abdominal operations.
Bucknall TE
Surg Annu; 1985; 17():1-22. PubMed ID: 3883538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary abdominal wound closure with permanent, continuous running monofilament sutures.
Archie JP; Feldtman RW
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Nov; 153(5):721-2. PubMed ID: 7027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal wound repair. An experimental study of the wound healing mechanism in the rabbit.
Nilsson T
Dan Med Bull; 1983 Nov; 30(6):394-407. PubMed ID: 6357647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Burst abdomen.
Br Med J; 1972 Jul; 3(5817):4-5. PubMed ID: 4557034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure.
Rappaport W; Allen R; Chvapil M; Benson D; Putnam C
Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 2221612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
Mathur SK
J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevention of abdominal disruption and postoperative hernia.
de Bruin TR
Int Surg; 1973 Jun; 58(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 4575068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention mesh: an alternative to retention sutures.
Yüce K
Eur J Surg; 1994 Nov; 160(11):641-2. PubMed ID: 7858050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevention of abdominal wound disruption utilizing the Smead-Jones closure technique.
Wallace D; Hernandez W; Schlaerth JB; Nalick RN; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 6994003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Postoperative eviscerations. Clinical and therapeutic study].
Otteni F; Sava G; Hollender LF
Acta Chir Belg; 1972 Mar; 71(2):82-97. PubMed ID: 4570823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A
Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of retention sutures in the prevention of experimental abdominal wound disruption.
Miles RM; Nash JP; Gillespie H; Dacus D
Am Surg; 1967 Nov; 33(11):898-905. PubMed ID: 4228814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Elimination of disruption of abdominal incisions.
Lord JW; Pfeffer RB; Golomb FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1969 Oct; 129(4):758-60. PubMed ID: 4898093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The causes of abdominal wound disruption.
Alexander HC; Prudden JF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1966 Jun; 122(6):1223-9. PubMed ID: 5328836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
