166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7928366)
1. Analysis of the effectiveness of emergency countermeasures in the 30-km zone during the early phase of the Chernobyl accident.
Likhtarev IA; Chumack VV; Repin VS
Health Phys; 1994 Nov; 67(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 7928366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of countermeasures in rural settlements in the long-term period after the accident at the Chernobyl AES].
Fesenko SV; Panov AV
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2002; 42(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 11898623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of external dose to inhabitants evacuated from the 30-km zone soon after the Chernobyl accident.
Imanaka T; Koide H
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2000; 40(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 11130948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effectiveness of measures directing to lowering the dose of radiation to residents of rural settlements in the extended period after the accident at the Chernobyl atomic energy station].
Panov AV; Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2001; 41(6):682-94. PubMed ID: 11785311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twenty years' application of agricultural countermeasures following the Chernobyl accident: lessons learned.
Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Balonov MI; Bogdevich IM; Howard BJ; Kashparov VA; Sanzharova NI; Panov AV; Voigt G; Zhuchenka YM
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Dec; 26(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 17146120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons from Chornobyl: Considerations for Strengthening Radiation Emergency Preparedness in Ukraine.
Bazyka D; Belyi D; Chumak A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 27521203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of risk factors for the formation of internal exposure dose to the rural population and effectiveness of preventive actions in agriculture in the long-term after the Chernobyl Accident].
Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM; Sanzharova NI; Fesenko GA; Panov AV; Pasternak AD; Vasilivetskiĭ VA; Kovalenko VI
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1999; 39(5):487-99. PubMed ID: 10576017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methodological approach to countermeasure options in rural settlements in the long terms after the accident at the Chernobyl NPP].
Fesenko SV; Panov AV; Aleksakhin RM
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2001; 41(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 11605244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint NATO/Ukraine workshop on the radiological consequences of Chernobyl. The integration of the civil and military response in the event of a nuclear accident in the United Kingdom.
Brown DC
J R Nav Med Serv; 2000; 86(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 11127139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of the strategy for the use of protective measures in agriculture after the accident at the Chernobyl power plant].
Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM; Sanzhrova NI; Lisianskiĭ BG
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1998; 38(5):721-36. PubMed ID: 9876496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [What kind of accidents can happen in a nuclear power plant].
Debes M
Rev Prat; 1995 Mar; 45(6 Spec No):41-5. PubMed ID: 7754324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The build up of absorbed doses in the critical organs of cereal grains in a contaminated area after the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station].
Spirin EV
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1997; 37(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 9244536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The long-term management of nuclear emergencies: the principles.
Baverstock K; Cherp A; Gray P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):3-5. PubMed ID: 15238648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergency preparedness and response: compensating victims of a nuclear accident.
Schwartz J
J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):89-96. PubMed ID: 15231352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chernobyl: a survivable ecological disaster?
Hilton J
Rev Environ Health; 1997; 12(4):215-33. PubMed ID: 9553997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Countermeasures for radiocesium in animal products in Norway after the Chernobyl accident--techniques, effectiveness, and costs.
Brynildsen LI; Selnaes TD; Strand P; Hove K
Health Phys; 1996 May; 70(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 8690577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Belarus: towards a new post-chernobyl rehabilitation strategy.
Trofimchik Z
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):141-5. PubMed ID: 15238673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An extended critical review of twenty years of countermeasures used in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident.
Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Balonov MI; Bogdevitch IM; Howard BJ; Kashparov VA; Sanzharova NI; Panov AV; Voigt G; Zhuchenka YM
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 383(1-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 17573097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The adaptation of natural plant populations to chronic irradiation due to the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station].
Dmitrieva SA
Tsitol Genet; 1996; 30(4):3-8. PubMed ID: 9005634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Genetic disorders in house mice after the accident at Chernobyl power plant].
Pomerantseva MD; Ramaĭa LK; Chekhovich AV
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1997; 37(4):645-8. PubMed ID: 9599624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
