These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7928796)

  • 1. The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities.
    Bambara LM; Ager C; Koger F
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):555-6. PubMed ID: 7928796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities.
    Foster-Johnson L; Ferro J; Dunlap G
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 7928791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.
    Waldron-Soler KM; Martella RC; Marchand-Martella NE; Ebey TL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 10738957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promoting stimulus control with textual prompts and performance feedback for persons with mild disabilities.
    Cuvo AJ; Davis PK; O'Reilly MF; Mooney BM; Crowley R
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):477-89. PubMed ID: 1634434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.
    Reyer HS; Sturmey P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jun; 50(Pt 6):404-9. PubMed ID: 16672034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of part versus whole instructional strategies on skill acquisition and excess behavior.
    Weld EM; Evans IM
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Jan; 94(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 2297424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.
    Lavie T; Sturmey P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 12102143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps.
    Parsons MB; Reid DH; Reynolds J; Bumgarner M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 2373661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.
    Taravella CC; Lerman DC; Contrucci SA; Roane HS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 10738960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
    Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.
    Newton JS; Ard WR; Horner RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 8331020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Units of analysis in task-analytic research.
    Haring TG; Kennedy CH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1988; 21(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 3417583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contriving establishing operations: responses of individuals with developmental disabilities during a learning task.
    Zayac RM; Johnston JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(3):202-16. PubMed ID: 17420114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.
    Parsons MB; Reid DH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 2373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction of self-injurious hand mouthing using response blocking.
    Reid DH; Parsons MB; Phillips JF; Green CW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):139-40. PubMed ID: 8473255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults.
    Mithaug DE; Hanawalt DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1978; 11(1):153-62. PubMed ID: 649523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.
    Fleming CV; Wheeler GM; Cannella-Malone HI; Basbagill AR; Chung YC; Day KG
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2010; 13(4):266-75. PubMed ID: 20629593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.
    Reid DH; Everson JM; Green CW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 10641301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral interventions to reduce the pica of persons with developmental disabilities.
    McAdam DB; Sherman JA; Sheldon JB; Napolitano DA
    Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):45-72. PubMed ID: 14710707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.
    Kodak T; Miltenberger RG; Romaniuk C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14596581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.