211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7929519)
1. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing.
Hickerson WL; Kealey GP; Smith DJ; Thomson PD
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pilot study of a unique film dressing for the treatment of donor site wounds.
Himel HN; Ratliff CR; Baruch LD; Rodeheaver GT
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1998; 19(1 Pt 1):62-5. PubMed ID: 9502027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam), hydrocellular foam dressing (Allevyn), and petrolatum gauze for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing.
Pak CS; Park DH; Oh TS; Lee WJ; Jun YJ; Lee KA; Oh KS; Kwak KH; Rhie JW
Int Wound J; 2019 Apr; 16(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 30479060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of skin-grafted burn wounds with Xeroform and layers of dry coarse-mesh gauze dressing results in excellent graft take and minimal nursing time.
Hansbrough W; Doré C; Hansbrough JF
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 8537426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Dressing Materials on Donor Site Morbidity: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya.
Macharia M; Nangole FW
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jul; 83(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 31194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds.
Lairet KF; Baer D; Leas ML; Renz EM; Cancio LC
J Burn Care Res; 2014; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of four different dressings on donor site wounds.
Beldon P
Br J Nurs; 2004 Mar; 13(6 Suppl):S38-45. PubMed ID: 15126974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds.
Jurczak F; Dugré T; Johnstone A; Offori T; Vujovic Z; Hollander D;
Int Wound J; 2007 Mar; 4(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 17425549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment.
Barnea Y; Amir A; Leshem D; Zaretski A; Weiss J; Shafir R; Gur E
Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Aug; 53(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 15269581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings.
Malpass KG; Snelling CF; Tron V
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):430-9. PubMed ID: 12900600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two dressings in the management of partial-thickness donor sites.
Martini L; Reali UM; Borgognoni L; Brandani P; Andriessen A
J Wound Care; 1999 Oct; 8(9):457-60. PubMed ID: 10818895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective trial comparing Biobrane, Duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites.
Feldman DL; Rogers A; Karpinski RH
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jul; 173(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1907769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting.
Brölmann FE; Eskes AM; Goslings JC; Niessen FB; de Bree R; Vahl AC; Pierik EG; Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT;
Br J Surg; 2013 Apr; 100(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 23460253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.
Singh A; Halder S; Menon GR; Chumber S; Misra MC; Sharma LK; Srivastava A
Asian J Surg; 2004 Oct; 27(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15564189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Eskes AM; Brölmann FE; Gerbens LA; Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H;
Trials; 2011 Oct; 12():229. PubMed ID: 21999705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
