271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7929979)
1. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Feine JS; Maskawi K; de Grandmont P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1646-56. PubMed ID: 7929979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: psychometric evaluation.
de Grandmont P; Feine JS; Taché R; Boudrias P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1096-104. PubMed ID: 8006237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis.
Feine JS; de Grandmont P; Boudrias P; Brien N; LaMarche C; Taché R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1105-11. PubMed ID: 8006238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: psychometric evaluation and patient preference.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1997 Oct; 76(10):1675-83. PubMed ID: 9326900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comminution of food with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Geertman ME; Slagter AP; van Waas MA; Kalk W
J Dent Res; 1994 Dec; 73(12):1858-64. PubMed ID: 7814759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes.
de Albuquerque Júnior RF; Lund JP; Tang L; Larivée J; de Grandmont P; Gauthier G; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Dec; 11(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 11168249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
Heydecke G; Boudrias P; Awad MA; De Albuquerque RF; Lund JP; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 12562375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biting Force and Muscle Activity in Implant-Supported Single Mandibular Overdentures Opposing Fixed Maxillary Dentition.
Al-Magaleh WR; Abbas NA; Amer AA; Abdelkader AA; Bahgat B
Implant Dent; 2016 Apr; 25(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 26684910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: A within-subject study.
ELsyad MA; El-Asfahani IA; Kortam SA; Mourad SI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 33604996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Occlusal force and mandibular movements in patients with removable overdentures and fixed prostheses supported by implants in the maxilla.
Jemt T; Book K; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 8225465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuromuscular coordination of masticatory muscles in subjects with two types of implant-supported prostheses.
Ferrario VF; Tartaglia GM; Maglione M; Simion M; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 15008934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mastication improvement after partial implant-supported prosthesis use.
Gonçalves TM; Campos CH; Gonçalves GM; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RC
J Dent Res; 2013 Dec; 92(12 Suppl):189S-94S. PubMed ID: 24158344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
Elsyad MA; Hegazy SA; Hammouda NI; Al-Tonbary GY; Habib AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function.
Rodriguez AM; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 11885168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
