These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7930068)

  • 1. Recognition of plosive syllables in noise: comparison of an auditory model with human performance.
    Ainsworth WA; Meyer GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):687-94. PubMed ID: 7930068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables in noise.
    Geisler CD; Gamble T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1639-52. PubMed ID: 2708680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using auditory-visual speech to probe the basis of noise-impaired consonant-vowel perception in dyslexia and auditory neuropathy.
    Ramirez J; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1122-33. PubMed ID: 16158666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch and voiced/unvoiced determination with an auditory model.
    Van Immerseel LM; Martens JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3511-26. PubMed ID: 1619127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold.
    Young ED; Barta PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):426-42. PubMed ID: 3950195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The responses of models of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers in a damaged cochlea to speech syllables in noise.
    Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2192-205. PubMed ID: 2600310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hidden Hearing Loss Impacts the Neural Representation of Speech in Background Noise.
    Monaghan JJM; Garcia-Lazaro JA; McAlpine D; Schaette R
    Curr Biol; 2020 Dec; 30(23):4710-4721.e4. PubMed ID: 33035490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia?
    Rosen S; Manganari E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 44(4):720-36. PubMed ID: 11521767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance-intensity functions at absolute and masked thresholds.
    Studebaker GA; Gilmore C; Sherbecoe RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3418-21. PubMed ID: 8326067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the responses of auditory nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables with predictions from linear models.
    Sinex DG; Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 6747103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.