These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7930269)
21. From science to practice. Meta-analyses using individual patient data are needed. Oxman AD; Clarke MJ; Stewart LA JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(10):845-6. PubMed ID: 7650811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses: the QUOROM statement. Will it help? Christensen E J Hepatol; 2001 Feb; 34(2):342-5. PubMed ID: 11281568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Therapeutic decisions based on meta analyses]. Komossa K; Kissling W; Leucht S; Möller HJ Psychiatr Prax; 2008 Nov; 35(8):373-5. PubMed ID: 19016212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Egger M; Smith GD; Sterne JA Clin Med (Lond); 2001; 1(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 11792089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations. Delgado-Rodríguez M J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Feb; 60(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 16415253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meta-analysis: is moving the goal post the answer? Egger M; Smith GD; Sterne JA Lancet; 1998 May; 351(9114):1517. PubMed ID: 9605838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Commentary: searching for trials for systematic reviews: what difference does it make? Clarke M Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):123-4. PubMed ID: 11914307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. 'Proof' against homeopathy in fact supports Homeopathy. Rutten L; Stolper E Homeopathy; 2006 Jan; 95(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 16399260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. What end is this anyway? Rosenbaum P Homeopathy; 2006 Jan; 95(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 16399258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Jin ZC; Wu C; Zhou XH; He J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():132. PubMed ID: 25516509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Meta-analyses based on abstracted data: a step in the right direction, but only a first step. Piedbois P; Buyse M J Clin Oncol; 2004 Oct; 22(19):3839-41. PubMed ID: 15326196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Publication bias and the efficacy of antidepressants. Mathew SJ; Charney DS Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 166(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 19188290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The true meaning of DICE: don't ignore chance effects. Clarke M J R Soc Med; 2021 Dec; 114(12):575-577. PubMed ID: 34935558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Significance of Cochrane collaboration for evidence-based medicine]. Gøtzsche PC Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(26-27):3180-2. PubMed ID: 10925578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials in evaluating suture techniques and materials for elective midline abdominal closure. Fujita T Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):387; author reply 387-9. PubMed ID: 21685790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Inductive inference and experimental designs: The CONSORT and QUOROM statements. Lakhani KH Vet J; 2001 Mar; 161(2):102-3. PubMed ID: 11243679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Pogue J; Yusuf S Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9095):47-52. PubMed ID: 9433436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]