97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7931011)
1. Effectiveness of apical clearing: histological and radiographical evaluation.
Parris J; Wilcox L; Walton R
J Endod; 1994 May; 20(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 7931011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals.
Sepic AO; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ; Anderson RW
J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):240-5. PubMed ID: 2592877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current concepts of canal preparation.
Walton RE
Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 36(2):309-26. PubMed ID: 1572501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of preflaring on tactile detection of the apical constriction.
Stabholz A; Rotstein I; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 1995 Feb; 21(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 7714445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment.
Masiero AV; Barletta FB
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15606816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
