273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7931023)
1. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants.
Jeansonne MJ; White RR
J Endod; 1994 Jun; 20(6):276-8. PubMed ID: 7931023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants.
Kuruvilla JR; Kamath MP
J Endod; 1998 Jul; 24(7):472-6. PubMed ID: 9693573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A comparative in-vitro study of the bactericidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate plus cetrimide on root canal anaerobic bacterial flora].
D'Arcangelo C; Varvara G
Minerva Stomatol; 1998 Sep; 47(9):381-6. PubMed ID: 9835745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.
Oliveira DP; Barbizam JV; Trope M; Teixeira FB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):702-6. PubMed ID: 17368057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants.
Onçağ O; Hoşgör M; Hilmioğlu S; Zekioğlu O; Eronat C; Burhanoğlu D
Int Endod J; 2003 Jun; 36(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 12801290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: in vivo study.
Ercan E; Ozekinci T; Atakul F; Gül K
J Endod; 2004 Feb; 30(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 14977302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis.
Dametto FR; Ferraz CC; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; de Souza-Filho FJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jun; 99(6):768-72. PubMed ID: 15897866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite on the microhardness of root canal dentin.
Oliveira LD; Carvalho CA; Nunes W; Valera MC; Camargo CH; Jorge AO
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e125-8. PubMed ID: 17656125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants in instrumented root canals up to 72 h: an in vitro study.
Shahani MN; Subba Reddy VV
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 21521915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antifungal efficacy of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 17% EDTA with and without an antifungal agent.
Chandra SS; Miglani R; Srinivasan MR; Indira R
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):675-8. PubMed ID: 20307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Alpha-hemolytic streptococci and root canal irrigants. An evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate plus cetrimide].
D'Arcangelo C; Di Nardo Di Maio F; Varvara G
Minerva Stomatol; 1998 Sep; 47(9):367-71. PubMed ID: 9835743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Study of Antifungal Efficacy of Various Endodontic Irrigants with and without Clotrimazole in Extracted Teeth Inoculated with
Srinivasan S; Velusamy G; Munshi MAI; Radhakrishnan K; Tiwari RVC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1325-1330. PubMed ID: 33893253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine.
White RR; Hays GL; Janer LR
J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 9594771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel, chlorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants.
Ferraz CC; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 18278298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of six irrigants on primary endodontic pathogens.
Carson KR; Goodell GG; McClanahan SB
J Endod; 2005 Jun; 31(6):471-3. PubMed ID: 15917691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution.
Leonardo MR; Tanomaru Filho M; Silva LA; Nelson Filho P; Bonifácio KC; Ito IY
J Endod; 1999 Mar; 25(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 10321180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Residual antimicrobial activity associated with a chlorhexidine endodontic irrigant used with sodium hypochlorite.
White RR; Janer LR; Hays GL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 10649938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro assessment of tooth color alteration by two different types of endodontic irrigants.
Koursoumis AD; Kerezoudis NP; Kakaboura A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 25707821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Irrigants for non-surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth.
Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Sequeira-Byron P; de Souza RF; Carter B; Heft M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008948. PubMed ID: 22972129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver solution,
Tanvir Z; Jabin Z; Agarwal N; Anand A; Waikhom N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2023; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 37282416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
