These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7932268)

  • 1. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel.
    Ratledge DK; Smith BG; Wilson RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 7932268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Apr; 22(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 7769526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials.
    Hudson JD; Goldstein GR; Georgescu M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 8778391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The abrasive effect of glazed, unglazed, and polished porcelain on the wear of human enamel, and the influence of carbonated soft drinks on the rate of wear.
    al-Hiyasat AS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Gilmour WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 9484060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel wear by antagonistic restorative materials under erosive conditions.
    Wiegand A; Credé A; Tschammler C; Attin T; Tauböck TT
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2689-2693. PubMed ID: 28185090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel.
    Suzuki S; Suzuki SH; Cox CF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jan; 127(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 8568101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 May; 22(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7616345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy.
    Ramp MH; Suzuki S; Cox CF; Lacefield WR; Koth DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 9151273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Mar; 10(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11406790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives.
    Burgoyne AR; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 2051355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical height loss: an investigation of four restorative materials opposing enamel.
    Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Suzuki S
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Dec; 8(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 10895677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 7965907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 17720238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 20830885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.