BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7932855)

  • 1. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants.
    Fettig RH; Kay JF
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Status of the hydroxyapatite-coated unilateral subperiosteal implant using direct bone impressions.
    Stobaugh RK
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1310662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of subperiosteal implants with a unique composite coating: a case report.
    McMillan MH; Sahay V; Hahn H
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 8007028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of HA-coated subperiosteal implants.
    Minichetti JC
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(3):111-6; discussion 117-9. PubMed ID: 12837050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review.
    Lee JJ; Rouhfar L; Beirne OR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1372-9; discussion 1379-80. PubMed ID: 11117685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical technique revisited: treating the peri-implantoclasia of hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal implants.
    Nordquist WD; Jermyn AC
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 7643442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular bone growth induced by a hydroxylapatite-coated subperiosteal implant: a case report.
    Fish JM; Misch CE
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11831233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: a case report.
    Trisi P; Keith DJ; Rocco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 15747684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
    McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term retrospective studies on hydroxyapatite coated endosteal and subperiosteal implants.
    Golec TS; Krauser JT
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):39-65. PubMed ID: 1310661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses.
    Jemt T; Johansson J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant.
    Schou S; Pallesen L; Hjørting-Hansen E; Pedersen CS; Fibaek B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11168208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subperiosteal implant technology: report from Rumania.
    Sirbu I
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 12964800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term follow-up of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants--a clinical trial.
    Binahmed A; Stoykewych A; Hussain A; Love B; Pruthi V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):963-8. PubMed ID: 18271378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.