These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7934457)

  • 1. Consent when investigation is interrupted.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1994 Oct; 344(8929):1079. PubMed ID: 7934457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed consent when an investigation is interrupted.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1992 Jan; 339(8784):51-2. PubMed ID: 1345964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On being 'too crazy' to sign into a mental hospital: the issue of consent to psychiatric hospitalization.
    Hoge SK
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):431-50. PubMed ID: 7841515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supreme Court judgement: courts may now enforce stricter standards of disclosure on doctors.
    Brown FN
    Can Med Assoc J; 1980 Dec; 123(11):1167-8. PubMed ID: 7459756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent and 'wrongful birth': the Austrian Supreme Court's approach.
    Bernat E
    Med Law; 1992; 11(1-2):67-72. PubMed ID: 1522780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parental notification: is it settled?
    Donovan P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(5):243-6. PubMed ID: 7286175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent: does the First Amendment protect a patient's right to choose alternative treatment?
    Karpman A
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2000; 16(3):933-57. PubMed ID: 12645595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Mar; 288(6419):802-3. PubMed ID: 6423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent: court viewpoints and medical decision making.
    Mazur DJ
    Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 3773652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
    Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent: the law.
    Samuels A
    Med Sci Law; 1992 Jan; 32(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 1482426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teenagers and pregnancy: the law in 1979.
    Paul EW; Pilpel HF
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1979 Oct; 11(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 391587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
    Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State attempts to expand abortion informed consent requirements: new life after Gonzales v. Carhart?
    Gordon M
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(4):751-4. PubMed ID: 18076527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What should a doctor tell?
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Aug; 289(6440):325-6. PubMed ID: 6430460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure to warn.
    Dyer C
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Apr; 294(6579):1089-90. PubMed ID: 3107703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part Two.
    Robertson G
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Mar; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11658805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial: Consent to treatment: Supreme Court discards Bolam principle.
    Lewis C
    Med Leg J; 2015 Jun; 83(2):59-61; discussion 61. PubMed ID: 25962830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.