BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7935554)

  • 1. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recording characteristics of monopolar EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2000101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles.
    Chan RC; Hsu TC
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of motor unit firing rates by standard concentric needle electromyography.
    Gunreben G; Schulte-Mattler W
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Mar; 32(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1313354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
    Barkhaus PE; Periquet MI; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV; Andreassen S
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the size principle be detected in conventional EMG recordings?
    Ertas M; Stålberg E; Falck B
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Apr; 18(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7715629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concentric macro electromyography.
    Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Sep; 14(9):820-5. PubMed ID: 1922175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface detected potentials of normal and reinnervated motor units: a simulation study for muscles consisted of short fibres.
    Dimitrova NA; Disselhorst-Klug C; Trachterna A; Dimitrov GV; Rau G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12056337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part I. Normal subjects.
    Bauermeister W; Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1406764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps-brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging.
    Brown WF; Strong MJ; Snow R
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 May; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 3374514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the interimpulse interval on the propagation velocity of the motor unit potentials.
    Kossev A; Gerasimenko Y; Gantchev N; Christova P
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 31(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2009822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selectivity of spatial filters for surface EMG detection from the tibialis anterior muscle.
    Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Merletti R; Indino B; Graven-Nielsen T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12669992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recording and physical characteristics of disposable concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Tedman B; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Oct; 13(10):909-14. PubMed ID: 2233847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of MUAP properties in array surface EMG recordings of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle.
    Kallenberg LA; Preece S; Nester C; Hermens HJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e536-42. PubMed ID: 19138534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
    Wee AS; Ashley RA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram.
    Holobar A; Farina D; Gazzoni M; Merletti R; Zazula D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):551-62. PubMed ID: 19208498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Topographical characteristics of motor units of the lower facial musculature revealed by means of high-density surface EMG.
    Lapatki BG; Oostenveld R; Van Dijk JP; Jonas IE; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):342-54. PubMed ID: 16000526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part II. Patients with diseases of muscle and nerve.
    Gan R; Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1085-8. PubMed ID: 1406765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.