These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Colonic cancer screening: legal aspects of organization and liability]. Thouvenin D Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1998 Mar; 22(3 Suppl):S63-71. PubMed ID: 9762240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Screening of breast cancer]. Pamilo M Duodecim; 2001; 117(19):1885-6. PubMed ID: 12181918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Breaking the barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Rustgi AK Gastroenterology; 2004 May; 126(5):1232-3. PubMed ID: 15131780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legal and ethical aspects of medical screening. Rothstein MA Occup Med; 1996; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 8907049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism: the Texas experience. Drummond-Borg M; Aldis B; Johnson D; Wilson DP Tex Med; 2003 Sep; 99(9):50-2. PubMed ID: 14650804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for AIDS: legal and ethical issues. Kapp MB; Fortess EE N Engl J Hum Serv; 1986; 6(4):19-23. PubMed ID: 10289742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Consequences of legal medicine in incidence of colonic cancer screening]. Lefevre R Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1998 Mar; 22(3 Suppl):S56-62. PubMed ID: 9762239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New Zealand's cervical screening legislation-and response. Gray B; Lewis H; Casey D N Z Med J; 2008 Jan; 121(1268):U2910. PubMed ID: 18256722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Requests for screening tests. What if patients insist? Winkelaar PG Can Fam Physician; 1999 May; 45():1179. PubMed ID: 10349059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Genetic carrier screening for hemoglobinopathies in the Netherlands is not opportune]. Schulpen TW; van der Lee JH; van der Most van Spijk MW; Beemer FA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 May; 142(18):1019-22. PubMed ID: 9623203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Low yield of population-based screening for Type 2 diabetes in the Netherlands: the ADDITION Netherlands study. Janssen PG; Gorter KJ; Stolk RP; Rutten GE Fam Pract; 2007 Dec; 24(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 17962235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening for cervical carcinoma. van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. AIDS: who should be tested? The Reagan administration splits over mandatory screening. Monmaney T; Wingert P; Raine G; Gosnell M Newsweek; 1987 May; 109(19):64-5. PubMed ID: 10281582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Average-risk screening: is public policy compatible with individual needs? Levin B; Hawley ST Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Oct; 9(4):665-77; discussion 679-81. PubMed ID: 11008231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pilot sites for colorectal cancer screening get the green light. Kohli HS Natl Med J India; 1999; 12(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 10416326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Tennessee HIV Pregnancy Screening Act of 1997. Moore WL Tenn Med; 1999 Apr; 92(4):141-2. PubMed ID: 10194983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]