220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7936570)
1. Management of exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
Kim YD; Goldberg RA; Shorr N; Steinsapir KD
Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1709-15. PubMed ID: 7936570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
Spirnak JP; Nieves N; Hollsten DA; White WC; Betz TA
Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 119(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 7535979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vascularization of coralline versus synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants assessed by gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Celik T; Yuksel D; Kosker M; Kasim R; Simsek S
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Mar; 40(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 24871378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve in bioceramic orbital implants.
Liao SL; Shih MJ; Lin LL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 139(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 15733982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.
Su GW; Yen MT
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 15266140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications of porous spherical orbital implants.
Remulla HD; Rubin PA; Shore JW; Sutula FC; Townsend DJ; Woog JJ; Jahrling KV
Ophthalmology; 1995 Apr; 102(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 7536909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Report of six cases.
Goldberg RA; Holds JB; Ebrahimpour J
Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):831-6. PubMed ID: 1317539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-stage procedure for management of large exposure defects of hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
Salour H; Owji N; Farahi A
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2003; 13(9-10):789-93. PubMed ID: 14700101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Experience with 100 cases.
McNab A
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1995 May; 23(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 7546686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of temporalis fascia for exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
Pelletier CR; Jordan DR; Gilberg SM
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 May; 14(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 9612812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevention and management of complications associated with the hydroxyapatite implant.
Kaltreider SA; Newman SA
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Mar; 12(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 8652455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: histopathologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants.
Nunery WR; Heinz GW; Bonnin JM; Martin RT; Cepela MA
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Jun; 9(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 8391837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants.
Rubin PA; Popham JK; Bilyk JR; Shore JW
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7522048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porous implant exposure: Incidence, management, and morbidity.
Custer PL; Trinkaus KM
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17237680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Müller muscle flap for repair of an exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
Rosen CE
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 May; 14(3):204-7. PubMed ID: 9612813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary placement of a titanium sleeve in hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
Liao SL; Chen MS; Lin LL
Eye (Lond); 2005 Apr; 19(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 15297860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI of orbital hydroxyapatite implants.
Flanders AE; De Potter P; Rao VM; Tom BM; Shields CL; Shields JA
Neuroradiology; 1996 Apr; 38(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 8741201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bovine hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a preliminary report.
Perry JD; Goldberg RA; McCann JD; Shorr N; Engstrom R; Tong J
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jul; 18(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 12142759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term complications of different porous orbital implants: a 21-year review.
Lin CW; Liao SL
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 101(5):681-685. PubMed ID: 27474155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
De Potter P; Shields CL; Shields JA; Flanders AE; Rao VM
Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):824-30. PubMed ID: 1375714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
