These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7937039)
1. Posterior composites: injecting composite resins and using Mylar matrix bands will eliminate gingival margin failures and increase tight contacts. Belvedere PC Northwest Dent; 1994; 73(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 7937039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct bulk placement for posterior composites using an anatomically shaped clear matrix creating true anatomic interproximal surfaces. Belvedere PC J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2006; 85(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 16821330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The elusive tight contact with composite restorations. How to achieve it. Karst LE Dent Today; 2003 Nov; 22(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 14650341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Bell system: direct resin methodology. Davis MW Dent Today; 2001 Feb; 20(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 12524857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A "recipe for success" with posterior composites utilizing preheated resins. Lambert DL Dent Today; 2008 Nov; 27(11):126, 128-31. PubMed ID: 19025079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 3. Matrix systems. van der Vyver PJ SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):221-6. PubMed ID: 12229077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A prescription for the successful use of heavy filled composites in the posterior dentition. Davidson DF; Suzuki M J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 May; 65(5):256-60. PubMed ID: 10380400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self-etching primer and a novel matrix. Bertolotti RL; Laamanen H Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 10635278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Custom matrix adaptation with elastic cords. Chan DC Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 11504444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microhardness of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions. Kays BT; Sneed WD; Nuckles DB J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):487-90. PubMed ID: 2066884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A technical advance in esthetic dentistry. Gwinnett AJ; Hollins K N Y State Dent J; 1985 Oct; 51(8):466-8. PubMed ID: 3863076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of custom occlusal matrix technique for posterior light-cured composites. Hamilton JC; Krestik KE; Dennison JB Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 9855853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simplified technique for obtaining predictable contacts in posterior composite resin restorations. Dragan WB Quintessence Int; 1986 Oct; 17(10):655-7. PubMed ID: 3466195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]