BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7937153)

  • 1. Functional differences between the Oct2 transactivation domains determine the transactivation potential of individual Oct2 isoforms.
    Annweiler A; Zwilling S; Wirth T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1994 Oct; 22(20):4250-8. PubMed ID: 7937153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oct2 transactivation from a remote enhancer position requires a B-cell-restricted activity.
    Annweiler A; Müller-Immerglück M; Wirth T
    Mol Cell Biol; 1992 Jul; 12(7):3107-16. PubMed ID: 1620119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basal components of the transcription apparatus (RNA polymerase II, TATA-binding protein) contain activation domains: is the repetitive C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II a "portable enhancer domain"?
    Seipel K; Georgiev O; Gerber HP; Schaffner W
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1994 Oct; 39(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 7826625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The retinoic acid receptor-beta 2 contains two separate cell-specific transactivation domains, at the N-terminus and in the ligand-binding domain.
    Folkers GE; van der Leede BJ; van der Saag PT
    Mol Endocrinol; 1993 Apr; 7(4):616-27. PubMed ID: 8389001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The POU domains of the Oct1 and Oct2 transcription factors mediate specific interaction with TBP.
    Zwilling S; Annweiler A; Wirth T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1994 May; 22(9):1655-62. PubMed ID: 8202368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Domain structure of the NRIF3 family of coregulators suggests potential dual roles in transcriptional regulation.
    Li D; Wang F; Samuels HH
    Mol Cell Biol; 2001 Dec; 21(24):8371-84. PubMed ID: 11713274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr transactivator: cooperation with promoter-bound activator domains and binding to TFIIB.
    Agostini I; Navarro JM; Rey F; Bouhamdan M; Spire B; Vigne R; Sire J
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Sep; 261(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 8800208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional domains of the heavy metal-responsive transcription regulator MTF-1.
    Radtke F; Georgiev O; Müller HP; Brugnera E; Schaffner W
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1995 Jun; 23(12):2277-86. PubMed ID: 7610056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA-dependent transregulation by IE1 of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus: IE1 domains required for transactivation and DNA binding.
    Rodems SM; Pullen SS; Friesen PD
    J Virol; 1997 Dec; 71(12):9270-7. PubMed ID: 9371585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential transactivation potential of Oct1 and Oct2 is determined by additional B cell-specific activities.
    Pfisterer P; Annweiler A; Ullmer C; Corcoran LM; Wirth T
    EMBO J; 1994 Apr; 13(7):1654-63. PubMed ID: 8157005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unique transactivation sequence motif is found in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the single-strand-binding protein FBP.
    Duncan R; Collins I; Tomonaga T; Zhang T; Levens D
    Mol Cell Biol; 1996 May; 16(5):2274-82. PubMed ID: 8628294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional comparison of the Mus musculus molossinus and Mus musculus domesticus Sry genes.
    Dubin RA; Coward P; Lau YF; Ostrer H
    Mol Endocrinol; 1995 Dec; 9(12):1645-54. PubMed ID: 8614401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional differences between mammalian transcription activation domains at the yeast GAL1 promoter.
    Künzler M; Braus GH; Georgiev O; Seipel K; Schaffner W
    EMBO J; 1994 Feb; 13(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 8313909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Requirements for utilization of CREB binding protein by hypersensitive site two of the beta-globin locus control region.
    Johnson KD; Norton JE; Bresnick EH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2002 Apr; 30(7):1522-30. PubMed ID: 11917012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA-polymerase II and N-terminal segment of the human TATA binding protein (TBP) can mediate remote and proximal transcriptional activation, respectively.
    Seipel K; Georgiev O; Gerber HP; Schaffner W
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1993 Dec; 21(24):5609-15. PubMed ID: 8284205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oct2 transcription factor of a teleost fish: activation domains and function from an enhancer.
    Cioffi CC; Pollenz RS; Middleton DL; Wilson MR; Miller NW; William Clem L; Warr GW; Ross DA
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2002 Aug; 404(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 12127069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three classes of mammalian transcription activation domain stimulate transcription in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Remacle JE; Albrecht G; Brys R; Braus GH; Huylebroeck D
    EMBO J; 1997 Sep; 16(18):5722-9. PubMed ID: 9312030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. C-terminal activating and inhibitory domains determine the transactivation potential of BSAP (Pax-5), Pax-2 and Pax-8.
    Dörfler P; Busslinger M
    EMBO J; 1996 Apr; 15(8):1971-82. PubMed ID: 8617244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcriptional activation domain of the muscle-specific gene-regulatory protein myf5.
    Braun T; Winter B; Bober E; Arnold HH
    Nature; 1990 Aug; 346(6285):663-5. PubMed ID: 2385294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcription factor Oct-2A contains functionally redundant activating domains and works selectively from a promoter but not from a remote enhancer position in non-lymphoid (HeLa) cells.
    Müller-Immerglück MM; Schaffner W; Matthias P
    EMBO J; 1990 May; 9(5):1625-34. PubMed ID: 2328728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.