These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7937261)

  • 41. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
    Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.
    Roberts JF; Attari N; Sherriff M
    Br Dent J; 2005 Apr; 198(7):427-31. PubMed ID: 15870802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An investigation of factors influencing the longevity of restorations in primary molars.
    Wong FS; Day SJ
    J Int Assoc Dent Child; 1990 Jul; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 2074359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical success and survival of indirect resin composite crowns: results of a 3-year prospective study.
    Jongsma LA; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):952-60. PubMed ID: 22608959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Guven Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA; Messer LB
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
    Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Amalgam fillings in the deciduous and mixed dentition--a post-treatment evaluation of service life and quality].
    Pieper K; Beinhauer A; Redeker M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):606-8. PubMed ID: 1817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
    Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical survey on type of restoration in deciduous teeth.
    Fukuyama T; Oda S; Yamashita H; Sekiguchi H; Yakushiji M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2008 Feb; 49(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18580051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Longevity of posterior restorations.
    Mjör IA; Jokstad A; Qvist V
    Int Dent J; 1990 Feb; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 2407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.
    Roberts JF; Sherriff M
    Br Dent J; 1990 Oct; 169(8):237-44. PubMed ID: 2147106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.