These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7937372)

  • 1. Late mechanical stability of the proximal coated AML prosthesis.
    Sugiyama H; Whiteside LA; Engh CA; Otani T
    Orthopedics; 1994 Jul; 17(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 7937372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical evaluation of cadaver retrieval specimens of cementless bone-ingrown total hip arthroplasty femoral components.
    Whiteside LA; White SE; Engh CA; Head W
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Apr; 8(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 8478633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs.
    Callaghan JJ; Fulghum CS; Glisson RR; Stranne SK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Jul; 74(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 1634574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Torsional fixation of a modular femoral hip component.
    Ohl MD; Whiteside LA; McCarthy DS; White SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Feb; (287):135-41. PubMed ID: 8448932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical consequences of bone ingrowth in a hip prosthesis inserted without cement.
    Keaveny TM; Bartel DL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jun; 77(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 7782364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems.
    Bachus KN; Bloebaum RD; Jones RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):248-57. PubMed ID: 10627742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of collar and distal stem fixation on micromotion of the femoral stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA; Easley JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Feb; (239):145-53. PubMed ID: 2912614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Torsional fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. The effect of surgical press-fit technique.
    Sugiyama H; Whiteside LA; Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Feb; (275):187-93. PubMed ID: 1735211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial stability of a collarless wedge-shaped prosthesis in the femoral canal.
    Sharkey PF; Albert TJ; Hume EL; Rothman RH
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 10149562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of porous coating and collar support on early load transfer for a cementless hip prosthesis.
    Keaveny TM; Bartel DL
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1205-16. PubMed ID: 8253825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loosely implanted cementless stems may become rotationally stable after loading.
    Kannan A; Owen JR; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2231-6. PubMed ID: 24664196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a collar on subsidence and local micromotion of cementless femoral stems: in vitro comparative study based on micro-computerised tomography.
    Malfroy Camine V; Rüdiger HA; Pioletti DP; Terrier A
    Int Orthop; 2018 Jan; 42(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28589313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Our Experience with RM Pressfit Vitamys Cup and Cementless Optimys Short Stem].
    ŠŤastnÝ E; Hanus M; HudÁk R; Ďurica D; TrČ T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32773014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of a distally interlocked press-fit femoral total hip prosthesis.
    Mahomed N; Schatzker J; Hearn T
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Apr; 8(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 8478629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement.
    Whiteside LA; White SE; McCarthy DS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1995 Oct; 24(10):766-70. PubMed ID: 8593558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical testing system to determine micromotion between hip implant and femur accounting for deformation of the hip implant: Assessment of the influence of rigid body assumptions on micromotions measurements.
    Leuridan S; Goossens Q; Roosen J; Pastrav L; Denis K; Mulier M; Desmet W; Vander Sloten J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Feb; 42():70-78. PubMed ID: 28110243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixation of the modular total hip femoral component in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA; Arima J; White SE; Branam L; McCarthy DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):184-90. PubMed ID: 8118973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Binnington AG; Szivek JA
    J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 3305844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.