These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. An in vitro evaluation of a copolymerizable type of microfilled composite resin. Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 8190883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers. Stober T; Henninger M; Schmitter M; Pritsch M; Rammelsberg P J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units. Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Tagtekin DA; Yanikoglu FC; Bozkurt FO; Kologlu B; Sur H Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites. Kawai K; Leinfelder KF Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 8621046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites. St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Say EC; Civelek A; Nobecourt A; Ersoy M; Guleryuz C Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 14531611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Peutzfeldt A; García-Godoy F; Asmussen E Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Influences of composition on brush wear of composite resins. Influences of particle size and content of filler]. Yuasa S Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):659-78. PubMed ID: 2134832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins. Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The frictional coefficients and associated wear resistance of novel low-shrink resin-based composites. Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Marquis PM; Pintado MR; Randall RC; Douglas WH Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1111-8. PubMed ID: 16085304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. Reich SM; Petschelt A; Wichmann M; Frankenberger R J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Apr; 69(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 14999752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]